Answer:
it is called arachnophobia
Explanation:
most reason are they way they walk and jump and the people who know they have 4 eyes
Hope This Helped i Like Spiders (^^vv^^) (spider smiley face)
A proton travels through a constant magnetic field in the negative y-direction while moving in the negative x-direction. The proton will be subject to a magnetic pull that is directed into the page. Option B is correct.
<h3>What is the right-hand thumb rule?</h3>
Hold a current-carrying conductor in your right hand with your thumb pointing in the direction of the current then wrap your fingers around the conductor and orient them in the direction of the magnetic field lines.
A proton travels through a constant magnetic field in the negative y-direction while moving in the negative x-direction.
The proton will be subject to a magnetic pull that is directed into the page.
Hence, option B is correct.
To learn more about the right-hand thumb rule refer to the link;
brainly.com/question/11521829
#SPJ1
Correct answer choice is:
D. A continuous transmission of energy from one location to the next.
Explanation:
Waves include the carrier of energy without the carrier of matter. In outcome, a wave can be characterized as a change that progresses into a medium, carrying energy from one spot (its source) to different spot without carrying matter.
Answer:

Explanation:
The apparent brightness follows an inverse square law, therefore we can write:

where I is the apparent brightness and r is the distance from the Sun.
We can also rewrite the law as
(1)
where in this problem, we have:
apparent brightness at a distance
, where
million km
We want to estimate the apparent brightness at
, where
is ten times
, so

Re-arranging eq.(1), we find
:

Answer:
(E) a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations impossible
Explanation:
The trade is one strong reflection for many weak reflections (and more dangerous near-Earth space travel).
None of the answer choices except the last one has anything to do with the effect of exploding a satellite. When you are arguing that exploding a satellite is ill conceived, you need to address specifically the effects of exploding the satellite.