Answer:
Combination circuit; The basic strategy for the analysis of combination circuits involves using the meaning of equivalent resistance for parallel branches to transform the combination circuit into a series circuit.
Example:
The use of both series and parallel connections within the same circuit. In this case, light bulbs A and B are connected by parallel connections and light bulbs C and D are connected by series connections. This is an example of a combination circuit.
Answer:
1 ) Accuracy of the Machine Tool
2) Load bearing capacity
3) Linearity in the product line
4) Torque of the machine
Explanation:
we know that machine tool is the permanent essential in manufacturing industries
it is a machine use for different form like cutting , grinding and boring etc
so 1st is
1 ) Accuracy of the Machine Tool
we know it is very important Characteristic of the machine tool because when we use it in manufacturing unit Accuracy of the Machine Tool should be higher concern
2) Load bearing capacity
we should very careful about Load bearing capacity because how much amount of load tool will bear check by some parameter like creep , shear stress and strength etc
3) Linearity in the product line
Linearity in the product line mean that it should be group of related product produced by the any one of the manufacturer otherwise it will take time or it may be intermixing
4) Torque of the machine
we know that Torque is a rotational force or a turning force so amount of force multiplied by the distance of the operation
and we know torque per second give the power rating of machine tool
Answer:
Explanation:
The schedule using shortest remaining time, non-preemptive priority and round Robin with quantum number 30 is shown in the attached file, please kindly go through it to access the answer.
Answer:
Artefacts can influence our actions in several ways. They can be instruments, enabling and facilitating actions, where their presence affects the number and quality of the options for action available to us. They can also influence our actions in a morally more salient way, where their presence changes the likelihood that we will actually perform certain actions. Both kinds of influences are closely related, yet accounts of how they work have been developed largely independently, within different conceptual frameworks and for different purposes. In this paper I account for both kinds of influences within a single framework. Specifically, I develop a descriptive account of how the presence of artefacts affects what we actually do, which is based on a framework commonly used for normative investigations into how the presence of artefacts affects what we can do. This account describes the influence of artefacts on what we actually do in terms of the way facts about those artefacts alter our reasons for action. In developing this account, I will build on Dancy’s (2000a) account of practical reasoning. I will compare my account with two alternatives, those of Latour and Verbeek, and show how my account suggests a specification of their respective key concepts of prescription and invitation. Furthermore, I argue that my account helps us in analysing why the presence of artefacts sometimes fails to influence our actions, contrary to designer expectations or intentions.
When it comes to affecting human actions, it seems artefacts can play two roles. In their first role they can enable or facilitate human actions. Here, the presence of artefacts changes the number and quality of the options for action available to us.Footnote1 For example, their presence makes it possible for us to do things that we would not otherwise be able to do, and thereby adopt new goals, or helps us to do things we would otherwise be able to do, but in more time, with greater effort, etc
Explanation:
Technological artifacts are in general characterized narrowly as material objects made by (human) agents as means to achieve practical ends. ... Unintended by-products of making (e.g. sawdust) or of experiments (e.g. false positives in medical diagnostic tests) are not artifacts for Hilpinen.
Answer:
It's an intoduction to hacking and systematic programming.
Explanation:
Yes, you might be able to grasp a few things from it, but it also may be a way hackers could hack you, by luring you to click it.
