22.4L
of any gas contains 1 mol of that gas.
50.75g/10L*22.4L/1 mol= 113.68g/mol- this is the mole weight of your gas
1 mol/113.68g*129.3g=1.137403 mol
Set up a ratio
1.137403mol/x L=1 mol/22.4 L
X=25.477827L, or with sig figs, x=25.5L
Answer:
The molarity of the solution is 0,31 M
Explanation:
We calculate the weight of 1 mol of NaCl from the atomic weights of each element of the periodic table. Then, we calculate the molarity, which is a concentration measure that indicates the moles of solute (in this case NaCl) in 1000ml of solution (1 liter)
Weight 1 mol NaCl= Weight Na + Weight Cl= 23 g + 35, 5 g= 58, 5 g
58, 5 g-----1 mol NaCl
13,1 g ---------x= (13,1 g x 1 mol NaCl)/58, 5 g= 0, 224 mol NaCl
727 ml solution------ 0, 224 mol NaCl
1000ml solution------x= (1000ml solutionx0, 224 mol NaCl)/727 ml solution
x=0,308 mol NaCl---> <em>The solution is 0,31 molar (0,31 M)</em>
You have to figure out a way to write the two unknown abundances in terms of one variable.
The total abundance is 1 (or 100%). So if you say the abundance for the first one is X then the abundance for the second one has to be 1-X (where X is the decimal of the percentage so say 0.8 for 80%).
203(X) + 205(1-X) = 204.4
Then you just solve for X to get the percentage for TI-203.
And then solve for 1-X to get the percentage for TI-205.
After that the higher percentage would be the most abundant.
203x + 205 - 205x = 204.4
-2x + 205 = 204.4
-2x = -0.6
x = 0.3
1-x = 0.7
Then the TI-205 would have the highest percentage and would be the most abundant.
Answer:
371km
Explanation:
the lower the more fuel there is
Answer:The process of science is iterative.
Science circles back on itself so that useful ideas are built upon and used to learn even more about the natural world. This often means that successive investigations of a topic lead back to the same question, but at deeper and deeper levels. Let's begin with the basic question of how biological inheritance works. In the mid-1800s, Gregor Mendel showed that inheritance is particulate — that information is passed along in discrete packets that cannot be diluted. In the early 1900s, Walter Sutton and Theodor Boveri (among others) helped show that those particles of inheritance, today known as genes, were located on chromosomes. Experiments by Frederick Griffith, Oswald Avery, and many others soon elaborated on this understanding by showing that it was the DNA in chromosomes which carries genetic information. And then in 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick, again aided by the work of many others, provided an even more detailed understanding of inheritance by outlining the molecular structure of DNA. Still later in the 1960s, Marshall Nirenberg, Heinrich Matthaei, and others built upon this work to unravel the molecular code that allows DNA to encode proteins. And it doesn't stop there. Biologists have continued to deepen and extend our understanding of genes, how they are controlled, how patterns of control themselves are inherited, and how they produce the physical traits that pass from generation to generation. The process of science is not predetermined.
Any point in the process leads to many possible next steps, and where that next step leads could be a surprise. For example, instead of leading to a conclusion about tectonic movement, testing an idea about plate tectonics could lead to an observation of an unexpected rock layer. And that rock layer could trigger an interest in marine extinctions, which could spark a question about the dinosaur extinction — which might take the investigator off in an entirely new direction. At first this process might seem overwhelming. Even within the scope of a single investigation, science may involve many different people engaged in all sorts of different activities in different orders and at different points in time — it is simply much more dynamic, flexible, unpredictable, and rich than many textbooks represent it as. But don't panic! The scientific process may be complex, but the details are less important than the big picture …
