Answer:
b. less than w.
Explanation:
In this question, the application of length contraction is what helps us come to our conclusion. When an object moves very fast (relative to the observer), the length of the object seems to be smaller than it actually is (again, for the observer).
This is supported by the length contraction equation below:
L = 
Here, L is the observed length
is the original length of the object
v is the relative speed between the object and the observer
and c is the speed of light
Using this equation, we can see that as the speed between the object and the observer is increased to be close to that of light, the square root in the equation gives us values less than 1.0
This effectively decreases the length that is observed.
Well, It rather depends on your definition of "machine." The normal physics set of simple machines - levers, pulleys, ramps all give you increased the force at the expense of reduced speed or increased the rate at the cost of reduced force. So, no - by definition a machine is an arrangement for multiplying one while paying the cost by reducing the other. You are looking at an example of the Conservation of Energy. One of the giant rules we are pretty sure cannot be violated.<span>
</span>
Has mass and occupied space
Answer:
Shiloh dynasty, jucie wrld or xxx or twenty one plot
Explanatio