Answer:
The change of the volume of the device during this cooling is 
Explanation:
Given that,
Mass of oxygen = 10 g
Pressure = 20 kPa
Initial temperature = 110°C
Final temperature = 0°C
We need to calculate the change of the volume of the device during this cooling
Using formula of change volume


Put the value into the formula



Hence, The change of the volume of the device during this cooling is 
Answer:
i believe its 26.7
Explanation:
if the runner goes 8.9 m/s each second while accelerating for 3 seconds to reach top speed, the top speed would be 26.7 m/s
To solve this problem it is necessary to apply the concepts related to the capacitance in the disks, the difference of the potential and the load in the disc.
The capacitance can be expressed in terms of the Area, the permeability constant and the diameter:

Where,
= Permeability constant
A = Cross-sectional Area
d = Diameter
Potential difference between the two disks,
V = Ed
Where,
E = Electric field
d = diameter
Q = Charge on the disk equal to 
Through the value found and the expression given for capacitance and potential, we can define the electric charge as





Re-arranging the equation to find the diameter of the disks, the equation will be:

Replacing,


Therefore the diameter of the disks is 0.03m
The kinetic energy gained by the air molecules is 0.0437 J
<h3 />
Given:
Mass of a coffee filter, m = 1.5 g
Height from which it is dropped, h = 3 m
Speed at ground, v = 0.7 m/s
Initially, the coffee filter has potential energy. It is given by :

P = 1.5 × 10⁻³ kg × 9.8 m/s² × 3m
P = 0.0441 J
Finally, it will have kinetic energy. It is given by :

×
× 10⁻³ × (0.7)²
E = 0.000343 J
The kinetic energy Kair did the air molecules gain from the falling coffee filter is :
E = 0.000343 - 0.0441
= 0.0437 J
So, the kinetic energy Kair did the air molecules gain from the falling coffee filter is 0.0437 J
Learn more about kinetic energy here:
brainly.com/question/8101588
#SPJ4
Look at the title of the graph, in small print under it.
Each point is "compared to 1950-1980 baseline". So the set of data for those years is being compared to itself. No wonder it matches up pretty close !