Hello, I would like to help you, but I really don't understand the question
An orbital that penetrates into the region occupied by core electrons is less shielded from nuclear charge than an orbital that does not penetrate and therefore has a lower energy.
Explanation:
The only true statement from the given options is that "an orbital that penetrates into the region occupied by core electrons is less shielded from nuclear charge than an orbital that does not penetrate and therefore has a lower energy." Inner orbitals which are also known to contain core electrons feels the bulk of the nuclear pull on them compared to the outermost orbitals containing the valence electrons.
- The nuclear pull is the effect of the nucleus pulling and attracting the electrons in orbitals.
- This pull is stronger for inner orbitals and weak on the outer ones.
- The outer orbitals are said to be well shielded from the pull of the nuclear charge.
- Also, based on the quantum theory, electrons in the outer orbitals have higher energies because they occupy orbitals at having higher energy value.
Learn more:
brainly.com/question/1832385
#learnmoreBrainly
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The electrons in an atom are specifically housed in locations that could be referred to as shells. These shells are the places where we can find an electron.
Now, within each shell, we have different energy levels in which these occupants electrons occupy. These energy levels have different energies and the amount of electrons they can take.
For example, the number of electrons S can take is 2 while that in which d can take is 10
Answer:
Food gives energy and we need it for our survival, without it we'll die
Explanation:
<span>Topic & Statement (ask a question)
Conduct Research
Form a Hypothesis
Conduct an Experiment
Collect Data
Analyze Results
Form Conclusions
Report & Present</span>
