Given that the speed of light is 2.998 x 108 m/s, what is the frequency of a wave that has a wavelength of 3.55 x 10-8 meters?

1 answer:

4 0

Its very easy, all we need is the following formula

c= λ x ν

c= speed of light
λ= wavelength
ν= frequency

we can rearrange the formula to solve for the unknown asked.

ν= c/λ

v= (2.998 x 10^8)/ (3.55 x 10^-8)= 8.45 x 10^15

You might be interested in

Which describes the process that forms teflon tm? molecular fluorine (f2) undergoes polymerization. a fluorocarbon polymer break

Stella [2.4K]

Answer:
T<span>etrafluoroethene (F</span>₂CCF₂<span>) undergoes polymerization describes the formation of Teflon.

Explanation:
Polymerization is the process in which small units called as monomers join together repeatedly and forms a long chain macro-molecule called as polymer.
In given question the monomer is Tetrafluoroethene because alkenes can undergo polymerization via Addition polymerization via following mechanism.
a) Free Radical Addition Reaction

b) Acid Catalyzed Addition Reaction

c) Base catalyzed Addition Reaction

The formation of Teflon from Tetrafluoroethene is shown below,</span>

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A motorcyclist completes a journey at an average speed of 65 mph

Andrews [41]

227.5

Hope this helps :)

8 0

2 years ago

Explain why water has a higher boiling point than carbon iv oxide and the two are simple molecular structures

Nezavi [6.7K]

Because H2O molecules make Hydrogen bounding and that's the first and strongest bound between molecules of a structure... So they stick together and don't let each other get evaporated...

U need lotsa energy to turn them into Gas shape

4 0

3 years ago

How many moles are in 12 grams of NH3?

aleksklad [387]

Answer:

molecular weight of NH3 or grams This compound is also known as Ammonia. The SI base unit for amount of substance is the mole. 1 mole is equal to 1 moles NH3, or 17.03052 grams.

8 0

2 years ago

Is it possible to prove that something is real or true of you can’t directly observe it? If no, why not? If yes, how would you d

dangina [55]

Answer:

I don't know if you can directly prove it with evidence if you haven't observed it but you can maybe take an educated guess by the aftermath of it?

For example, you see a burnt log. At this time, people don't know what fire is. After we study the log, we could see that it takes extreme temperature in order to burn the log and that would help people see that there is a force like fire that can cause this. In a way, finding out that extreme temperatures burns stuff is another step closer to the discovery and proof of fire

I hope that makes sense

4 0

2 years ago