Yes, it is the power of material evidence that wins.
- Evidence used to support or refute a scientific theory or hypothesis is known as material evidence.
- Evidence is also used by scientists in various contexts, such as when they apply ideas to real-world issues.
- Whether a person accepts the data as proof depends on their presumptions or views regarding how observations relate to a theory.
- A creative hypothesis is developed by a scientist and may be refuted by testing it against evidence or established truths.
- Evidence can refute a hypothesis by demonstrating facts that are at odds with it. In contrast, the presence of evidence does not preclude the possibility of future, undiscovered evidence supporting the idea.
Therefore, it is the power of material evidence that wins, not the authority of experts that
proves an answer in Science.
Learn more about hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/606806
#SPJ9
One: looks to be correct for both answers. Certainly the first one is. The second depends on your other choices. But military use is one.
Two: is correct. Pd has (in this case) an atomic mass of 114 and its number is 46
Three: Even with my slop numbers, 4.98 is the answer (although I get 4.99 but again, my numbers are pretty sloppy).
Four: Slop numbers say 78.3, but 78 is the right answer.
Five: Slop numbers agree with Al2S3. I think that's D
They are all correct. Very Fine Work.
To change only one variable which is very important than to test the experiment to match the hypothesis again, I think. It’s been a while since I was on that lesson♀️
Answer:
Because kinetic energy is proportional to the velocity squared, increases in velocity will have an exponentially greater effect on translation kinetic energy. Doubling the mass of an object will only double its kinetic energy, but doubling the velocity of the object will quadruple its velocity.
