1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lady_Fox [76]
3 years ago
5

The forced exerted on an object are shown. If the object moves right, which of the following is a possible value of F? Ignore my

answer please help.

Physics
2 answers:
Deffense [45]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

5N

Explanation:

Because if it moves to the right, that means F is weak and 6N is STRONK

nata0808 [166]3 years ago
6 0
5N.....................
You might be interested in
You place ammonium nitrate crystals in water and stirred. As you do so, the container becomes cold to the touch. This an example
ankoles [38]

The process of flask becoming cold is due to endothermic reaction.

Answer: Option B

<u>Explanation:</u>

So two kinds of heat transfer can be possible in any chemical reaction. If the sample is considered as system and the sample container is considered as the surrounding, then heat transfer can occur between them.

If the heat is transferred from the surrounding to the system , then it is an endothermic reaction. And in those cases, the sample holder will be becoming colder. This is because the heat from the surrounding that is the container will be utilized to complete the reaction.

While when there is transfer of heat from the system to surrounding , it will be exothermic reaction and the beaker will be getting hot in this process. So in the present case, the container is becoming cold because of occurrence of endothermic process.

8 0
4 years ago
Why you cannot use an elastic measuring tape to measure distance. What problem you may face if you use it
Stells [14]

The problem you would encounter is measuring the height of two different people, a tall one and a short one, and getting the same answer for both of them.

No matter WHAT we're hearing out of the White House these days, you CAN'T bend and stretch your standard measuring devices, or any other 'facts', to make them fit the thing that you're measuring.  This does not work.  You're always entitled to your own opinions, but you're not entitled to your own facts.

3 0
3 years ago
If you have two uncertainties, and they are from two different sources and contribute to the uncertainty of a measurement, what
Darya [45]

The propagation errors we can find the uncertainty of a given magnitude is the sum of the uncertainties of each magnitude.

                           Δm = ∑  | \frac{dm}{dx_i} | \ \Delta x_i

Physical quantities are precise values ​​of a variable, but all measurements have an uncertainty, in the case of direct measurements the uncertainty is equal to the precision of the given instrument.

When you have derived variables, that is, when measurements are made with different instruments, each with a different uncertainty, the way to find the uncertainty or error is used the propagation errors to use the variation of each parameter, keeping the others constant and taking the worst of the  cases, all the errors add up.

If m is the calculated quantity, x_i the measured values ​​and Δx_i the uncertainty of each value, the total uncertainty is

                      Δm = ∑  | \frac{dm}{dx_i } | \ \Delta x_i    | dm / dx_i | Dx_i

               

for instance:

If the magnitude is  a average of two magnitudes measured each with a different error

                     m = \frac{m_1+m_2}{2}

                     Δm = | \frac{dm}{dx_1} |  Δx₁ + | \frac{dm}{dx_2} | Δx₂

                     \frac{dm}{dx_1} = ½

                     \frac{dm}{dx_2} = ½

                     Δm = \frac{1}{2} Δx₁ + ½ Δx₂

                     Δm = Δx₁ + Δx₂

In conclusion, using the propagation errors we can find the uncertainty of a given quantity is the sum of the uncertainties of each measured quantity.

Learn more about propagation errors here:

brainly.com/question/17175455

6 0
3 years ago
Heat is added to a 2kg piece of ice at a rate of 793kW. How long will it take for ice to melt if it was initially 0?
Ede4ka [16]

Answer:

0.84 s

Explanation:

Step 1

Given information:

Mass of the ice (m) = 2.0 kg

Heat transfer rate (Q/T) = 793.0 kW

Latent heat of fusion of ice (Lf) = 334 kJ/kg

\frac{Q}{T}  =  \frac{mLf}{T}

Substituting the corresponding values we have:

793.0 kW=  \frac{2.0kg(334 kJ/kg)}{T} \\  T  =  \frac{2.0kg(334 kJ/kg)}{793.0kW}  =  \frac{668kJ}{793kW}   \\  = 0.84s

8 0
3 years ago
The football team is selling mulch as a fundraiser. Which two options are
satela [25.4K]
Noise does not affect the digital signal making it more reliable
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A 50kg girl is playing soccer. She runs towards the ball at a speed of 7 m/s. How much kinetic energy does she have as she runs
    8·2 answers
  • A plant blossoms with violet-colored flowers. The flowers appear violet because they all light rays except for rays.
    8·2 answers
  • What is the SI unit for momentum?<br> kg•m<br> kg•m/s<br> kg•m²/s<br> Kg•m/s^2
    5·1 answer
  • Helpppppppppp!!!!!!!!!!...​
    5·2 answers
  • I need help please someone
    6·1 answer
  • Briefly discuss:
    5·1 answer
  • 1/12 of 1/3 is what fraction?
    8·1 answer
  • A 120 g block attached to a spring with spring constant 3.0 N/m oscillates horizontally on a frictionless table. Its velocity is
    13·1 answer
  • 1. What is the difference between the two divisions of the skeletal system?
    14·1 answer
  • Why food cook faster with salt water than cook with pure water​
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!