1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
I am Lyosha [343]
3 years ago
12

Josh did an experiment recording the changes in temperature in sand and water when exposed to a light source, and then when the

light source was removed. Josh noticed that the sand heated up faster than the water and then cools faster than the water. Josh concludes that
Physics
2 answers:
Marrrta [24]3 years ago
7 0

Before going to solve this question first we have to understand specific heat capacity of a substance .

The specific heat of a substance is defined as amount of heat required to raise the temperature of 1 gram of substance through one degree Celsius. Let us consider a substance whose mass is m.Let Q amount of heat is given to it as a result of which its temperature is raised  from T to T'.

Hence specific heat  of a substance is calculated as-

                                              c= \frac{Q}{m[T'-T]}

Here c is the specific heat capacity.

The substance whose specific heat capacity is more will take more time to be heated up to a certain temperature as compared to a substance having low specific heat which is to be heated up to the same temperature.

As per the question John is experimenting on sand and water.Between sand and water,water has the specific heat 1 cal/gram per degree centigrade which is larger as compared to sand.Hence sand will be heated faster as compared to water.The substance which is heated faster will also cools faster.

From this experiment John concludes that water has more specific heat as compared to sand.

frozen [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

we can conclude that emissivity of sand will me more than the emissivity of water

Explanation:

As we know that here Source of light is the energy source from which energy is continuously incident on the Sand and Water

So here we know that rate of energy incident on sand and water will be from same source at same rate

Here this energy absorbed by the system is given as

\frac{dQ}{dt} = \sigma e A(T^4 - T_s^2)

so here the rate of energy absorbed is more sand than water

Also when source is off than rate of energy dissipated by sand is more than the water

So here we can conclude that emissivity of sand will me more than the emissivity of water

You might be interested in
A ball is thrown vertically upward with a speed v. an identical second ball is thrown upward with a speed 2v. how many times hig
vladimir2022 [97]
It goes twice as fast as the first one. Twice
6 0
3 years ago
A student standing on a knoll throws a snowball horizontally 4.5 meters above the level ground toward a smokestack 15 meters awa
Elan Coil [88]

Answer:

2.4 m

Explanation:

Consider the motion along the vertical direction

y_{o} = initial position of ball above the ground = 4.5 m

t = time taken by the ball to hit the smokestack = 0.65 s

v_{oy} = initial velocity of the ball along vertical direction

a_{y} = acceleration due to gravity = - 9.8 m/s²

y = position of ball at the time of hitting the smokestack

Using the kinematics equation

y = y_{o} + v_{oy} t + (0.5) a_{y} t^{2}

inserting the above values

y = 4.5 + (0) (0.65) + (0.5) (- 9.8) (0.65)^{2} \\y = 2.4 m

6 0
3 years ago
acceleration is defined as the rate of change for which characteristic? a. displacement b. position c. velocity d. time
fredd [130]
The answer is velocity.
7 0
4 years ago
Genes are organized on matching pairs of _______.
natta225 [31]

Answer:

homologous chromosomes

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What the name for the phenomenon of inducing voltage by changing the magnetic field around a conductor?
8090 [49]

The phenomenon of inducing voltage by changing the magnetic field around a conductor will be Electromagnetic Induction. Option B is correct.

<h3>What is the Faraday law of electromagnetic induction?</h3>

According to Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, the rate of change of magnetic flux link with the coil is responsible for generating emf in the coil to result in the flow of amount of current .

So in order to increase the current, we need to increase the EMF;

so we can increase it by;

1) Increasing the number of turns

2) Increase the area of the loop

3) By moving the magnet faster

Hence, option B is correct.

To learn more about Faraday law of electromagnetic induction:

brainly.com/question/13369951

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which characteristics do all terrestrial planets have?
    13·2 answers
  • A turnip is dropped from a height of 70 meters. How long does it take to hit the ground?
    14·1 answer
  • A stone is dropped from rest from the top of a cliff into a pond below. If its initial height is 10 m, what is its speed when it
    15·1 answer
  • I'm very confused on this home work question How did magnetism 'drive' the theory of plate tectonics?
    10·1 answer
  • The product of voltage across a device and the charge passing through it is:
    13·2 answers
  • Why does a siren have a lower pitch as it moves away from you? A The period of the sound wave is decreased B The amplitude of th
    15·2 answers
  • You decide it is time to clean your pool since summer is quickly approaching. Your pool maintenance guide specifies that the chl
    14·1 answer
  • Can waves move or transport matter? Why or why not?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the name of the unit you use to measure force?
    9·1 answer
  • Where is the location potential energy is converted to kinetic energy?<br> Please answer asap!!!!!
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!