1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
I am Lyosha [343]
2 years ago
12

Josh did an experiment recording the changes in temperature in sand and water when exposed to a light source, and then when the

light source was removed. Josh noticed that the sand heated up faster than the water and then cools faster than the water. Josh concludes that
Physics
2 answers:
Marrrta [24]2 years ago
7 0

Before going to solve this question first we have to understand specific heat capacity of a substance .

The specific heat of a substance is defined as amount of heat required to raise the temperature of 1 gram of substance through one degree Celsius. Let us consider a substance whose mass is m.Let Q amount of heat is given to it as a result of which its temperature is raised  from T to T'.

Hence specific heat  of a substance is calculated as-

                                              c= \frac{Q}{m[T'-T]}

Here c is the specific heat capacity.

The substance whose specific heat capacity is more will take more time to be heated up to a certain temperature as compared to a substance having low specific heat which is to be heated up to the same temperature.

As per the question John is experimenting on sand and water.Between sand and water,water has the specific heat 1 cal/gram per degree centigrade which is larger as compared to sand.Hence sand will be heated faster as compared to water.The substance which is heated faster will also cools faster.

From this experiment John concludes that water has more specific heat as compared to sand.

frozen [14]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

we can conclude that emissivity of sand will me more than the emissivity of water

Explanation:

As we know that here Source of light is the energy source from which energy is continuously incident on the Sand and Water

So here we know that rate of energy incident on sand and water will be from same source at same rate

Here this energy absorbed by the system is given as

\frac{dQ}{dt} = \sigma e A(T^4 - T_s^2)

so here the rate of energy absorbed is more sand than water

Also when source is off than rate of energy dissipated by sand is more than the water

So here we can conclude that emissivity of sand will me more than the emissivity of water

You might be interested in
Air resistance is an example of what type of friction?
Sav [38]
Well, Air resistance is a special type of friction (you cannot classify it in other categories). That force of air-resistance is often observed to oppose the motion of the object,( like every other frictional forces)

Hope this helps!
4 0
3 years ago
0.054x2.33x90............
guapka [62]
<h2>0.054×2.33×90</h2><h3>=0.11582×90</h3><h3>=11.3238</h3>

please mark this answer as brainlist

5 0
2 years ago
When a pair of balanced forces acts on an object, the net force that results is.
polet [3.4K]
D.  Equal to zero.

Because the forces balance each other.
7 0
3 years ago
It took a crew 9 h 36 min to row 8 km upstream and back again. If the rate of flow of the stream was 2 km/h, what was the rowing
babunello [35]

Answer:

3 km/h

Explanation:

Let's call the rowing speed in still water x, in km/h.

Rowing speed in upstream is: x - 2 km/h

Rowing speed in downstream is: x + 2 km/h

It took a crew 9 h 36 min ( = 9 3/5 = 48/5) to row 8 km upstream and back again. Therefore:

8/(x - 2) + 8/(x + 2) = 48/5      (notice that: time = distance/speed)

Multiplying by x² - 2², which is equivalent to (x-2)*(x+2)

8*(x+2) + 8*(x-2) =  (48/5)*(x² - 4)

Dividing  by 8

(x+2) + (x-2) = (6/5)*(x² - 4)

2*x = (6/5)*x² - 24/5

0 =  (6/5)*x² - 2*x - 24/5

Using quadratic formula

x = \frac{2 \pm \sqrt{(-2)^2 - 4(6/5)(-24/5)}}{2(6/5)}

x = \frac{2 \pm 5.2}{2.4}

x_1 = \frac{2 + 5.2}{2.4}

x_1 = 3

x_2 = \frac{2 - 5.2}{2.4}

x_2 = -1\; 1/3

A negative result has no sense, therefore the rowing speed in still water was 3 km/h

7 0
3 years ago
When falling through the air, which of the following objects will hit the ground first?
Pavel [41]

Answer:

a penny

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • True or false. Lateral to the inguinal region is the coxal region, while superior to the scapular region is the dorsal region.
    14·1 answer
  • Which two parameters can both be measured in meters
    15·2 answers
  • The main difference between the internal combustion engine and the diesel engine is that the diesel engine
    9·1 answer
  • Three light bulbs are connected to a battery in a series circuit.How will the bulbs behave if the circuit is closed
    8·2 answers
  • The density of gasoline is 730 kg/m3 at 0°C. Its average coefficient of volume expansion is 9.60 10-4(°C)−1. Assume 1.00 gal of
    7·1 answer
  • Mike enters a revolving door that is not moving. explain where and how mike should push to produce a torque with the least amoun
    7·2 answers
  • A cube of wood 15.0 cm on each side is tied to the bottom of a tank filled with water to a depth of 50 cm. The tension in the st
    14·1 answer
  • How does a free-body diagram tell you about the net force on an object?
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement correctly describes these electric field lines?
    6·1 answer
  • please help. Sound travels at 330 m/s. If a lightning bolt strikes the ground 5 m away from you, how long will it take for the s
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!