A first-order reaction is 81omplete in 264s.The half-life for this reaction (i) t 1/2 = =3.465×10 −3 s.to reach 95% Completion = 285 s.
To measure reaction rates, chemists initiate the reaction, measure the concentration of the reactant or product at different times as the reaction progresses,
For a 0-order response, the mathematical expression that may be employed to determine the half of life is: t1/2 = [R]0/2k. For a first-order reaction, the half of-existence is given by: t1/2 = zero.693/ok. For a 2d-order response, the method for the half-life of the response is: 1/okay[R]0
The 1/2-life of a response (t1/2), is the quantity of time needed for a reactant concentration to lower via half of compared to its initial awareness. Its software is used in chemistry and medicine to are expecting the awareness of a substance over time
Half of the lifestyles is the time required for exactly 1/2 of the entities to decay 50%.
Learn more about first order reaction here:-
#SPJ4
Answer:
ok
Explanation:
why I needed to give a answer to a question. I want to ask the question. brainly solve this issue. i cant ask questions without answering to 1 questions.
the bond in a molecule of Cl2 is a covalent bond
0.040 mol / dm³. (2 sig. fig.)
<h3>Explanation</h3>
in this question acts as a weak base. As seen in the equation in the question, produces 
rather than 
when it dissolves in water. The concentration of will likely be more useful than that of for the calculations here.
Finding the value of ![[\text{OH}^{-}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Ctext%7BOH%7D%5E%7B-%7D%5D)
from pH:
Assume that 
,
.
![[\text{OH}^{-}] =10^{-\text{pOH}} =10^{-2.80} = 1.59\;\text{mol}\cdot\text{dm}^{-3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Ctext%7BOH%7D%5E%7B-%7D%5D%20%3D10%5E%7B-%5Ctext%7BpOH%7D%7D%20%3D10%5E%7B-2.80%7D%20%3D%201.59%5C%3B%5Ctext%7Bmol%7D%5Ccdot%5Ctext%7Bdm%7D%5E%7B-3%7D)
.
Solve for ![[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{N}]_\text{initial}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BN%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Binitial%7D)
:
![\dfrac{[\text{OH}^{-}]_\text{equilibrium}\cdot[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{NH}^{+}]_\text{equilibrium}}{[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{N}]_\text{equilibrium}} = \text{K}_b = 1.58\times 10^{-3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdfrac%7B%5B%5Ctext%7BOH%7D%5E%7B-%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Bequilibrium%7D%5Ccdot%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BNH%7D%5E%7B%2B%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Bequilibrium%7D%7D%7B%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BN%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Bequilibrium%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Ctext%7BK%7D_b%20%3D%201.58%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-3%7D)
Note that water isn't part of this expression.
The value of Kb is quite small. The change in is nearly negligible once it dissolves. In other words,
![[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{N}]_\text{initial} = [(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{N}]_\text{final}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BN%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Binitial%7D%20%3D%20%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BN%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Bfinal%7D)
.
Also, for each mole of produced, one mole of 
was also produced. The solution started with a small amount of either species. As a result,
![[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{NH}^{+}] = [\text{OH}^{-}] = 10^{-2.80} = 1.58\times 10^{-3}\;\text{mol}\cdot\text{dm}^{-3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BNH%7D%5E%7B%2B%7D%5D%20%3D%20%5B%5Ctext%7BOH%7D%5E%7B-%7D%5D%20%3D%2010%5E%7B-2.80%7D%20%3D%201.58%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-3%7D%5C%3B%5Ctext%7Bmol%7D%5Ccdot%5Ctext%7Bdm%7D%5E%7B-3%7D)
.
![\dfrac{[\text{OH}^{-}]_\text{equilibrium}\cdot[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{NH}^{+}]_\text{equilibrium}}{[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{N}]_\textbf{initial}} = \text{K}_b = 1.58\times 10^{-3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdfrac%7B%5B%5Ctext%7BOH%7D%5E%7B-%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Bequilibrium%7D%5Ccdot%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BNH%7D%5E%7B%2B%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Bequilibrium%7D%7D%7B%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BN%7D%5D_%5Ctextbf%7Binitial%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Ctext%7BK%7D_b%20%3D%201.58%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-3%7D)
,
![[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{N}]_\textbf{initial} =\dfrac{[\text{OH}^{-}]_\text{equilibrium}\cdot[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{NH}^{+}]_\text{equilibrium}}{\text{K}_b}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BN%7D%5D_%5Ctextbf%7Binitial%7D%20%3D%5Cdfrac%7B%5B%5Ctext%7BOH%7D%5E%7B-%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Bequilibrium%7D%5Ccdot%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BNH%7D%5E%7B%2B%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Bequilibrium%7D%7D%7B%5Ctext%7BK%7D_b%7D)
,
![[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{N}]_\text{initial} =\dfrac{(1.58\times10^{-3})^{2}}{6.3\times10^{-5}} = 0.040\;\text{mol}\cdot\text{dm}^{-3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BN%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Binitial%7D%20%3D%5Cdfrac%7B%281.58%5Ctimes10%5E%7B-3%7D%29%5E%7B2%7D%7D%7B6.3%5Ctimes10%5E%7B-5%7D%7D%20%3D%200.040%5C%3B%5Ctext%7Bmol%7D%5Ccdot%5Ctext%7Bdm%7D%5E%7B-3%7D)
.
I would say physical, because a physical change is affecting the form of a chemical substance, but not it's chemical makeup.
