1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
FinnZ [79.3K]
3 years ago
14

A ball is thrown straight upward and returns to the thrower's hand after 2.65 s in the air. A second ball is thrown at an angle

of 34.0° with the horizontal. At what speed must the second ball be thrown so that it reaches the same height as the one thrown vertically? The acceleration of gravity is 9.81 m/s2.​
Physics
1 answer:
Leto [7]3 years ago
6 0

Explanation:

I wish I could help but I am taking Biology this year!Sorry but um....check your Physics book! Also,thanks for the math help!First, find the vertical speed of ball.

You might be interested in
2. Before 0.5-kg ball is dropped from a third story window 20 m above the sidewalk. What is the potential
Flauer [41]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

C

20*9.8*0.5

98

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Name the force which is responsible for revolution of moon around the earth
katrin [286]

Answer:

<em>Gravitational</em><em> force</em>

Explanation:

............

3 0
2 years ago
Very far from earth (at R- oo), a spacecraft has run out of fuel and its kinetic energy is zero. If only the gravitational force
Margaret [11]

Answer:

Speed of the spacecraft right before the collision: \displaystyle \sqrt{\frac{2\, G\cdot M_\text{e}}{R\text{e}}}.

Assumption: the earth is exactly spherical with a uniform density.

Explanation:

This question could be solved using the conservation of energy.

The mechanical energy of this spacecraft is the sum of:

  • the kinetic energy of this spacecraft, and
  • the (gravitational) potential energy of this spacecraft.

Let m denote the mass of this spacecraft. At a distance of R from the center of the earth (with mass M_\text{e}), the gravitational potential energy (\mathrm{GPE}) of this spacecraft would be:

\displaystyle \text{GPE} = -\frac{G \cdot M_\text{e}\cdot m}{R}.

Initially, R (the denominator of this fraction) is infinitely large. Therefore, the initial value of \mathrm{GPE} will be infinitely close to zero.

On the other hand, the question states that the initial kinetic energy (\rm KE) of this spacecraft is also zero. Therefore, the initial mechanical energy of this spacecraft would be zero.

Right before the collision, the spacecraft would be very close to the surface of the earth. The distance R between the spacecraft and the center of the earth would be approximately equal to R_\text{e}, the radius of the earth.

The \mathrm{GPE} of the spacecraft at that moment would be:

\displaystyle \text{GPE} = -\frac{G \cdot M_\text{e}\cdot m}{R_\text{e}}.

Subtract this value from zero to find the loss in the \rm GPE of this spacecraft:

\begin{aligned}\text{GPE change} &= \text{Initial GPE} - \text{Final GPE} \\ &= 0 - \left(-\frac{G \cdot M_\text{e}\cdot m}{R_\text{e}}\right) = \frac{G \cdot M_\text{e}\cdot m}{R_\text{e}} \end{aligned}

Assume that gravitational pull is the only force on the spacecraft. The size of the loss in the \rm GPE of this spacecraft would be equal to the size of the gain in its \rm KE.

Therefore, right before collision, the \rm KE of this spacecraft would be:

\begin{aligned}& \text{Initial KE} + \text{KE change} \\ &= \text{Initial KE} + (-\text{GPE change}) \\ &= 0 + \frac{G \cdot M_\text{e}\cdot m}{R_\text{e}} \\ &= \frac{G \cdot M_\text{e}\cdot m}{R_\text{e}}\end{aligned}.

On the other hand, let v denote the speed of this spacecraft. The following equation that relates v\! and m to \rm KE:

\displaystyle \text{KE} = \frac{1}{2}\, m \cdot v^2.

Rearrange this equation to find an equation for v:

\displaystyle v = \sqrt{\frac{2\, \text{KE}}{m}}.

It is already found that right before the collision, \displaystyle \text{KE} = \frac{G \cdot M_\text{e}\cdot m}{R_\text{e}}. Make use of this equation to find v at that moment:

\begin{aligned}v &= \sqrt{\frac{2\, \text{KE}}{m}} \\ &= \sqrt{\frac{2\, G\cdot M_\text{e} \cdot m}{R_\text{e}\cdot m}} = \sqrt{\frac{2\, G\cdot M_\text{e}}{R_\text{e}}}\end{aligned}.

6 0
3 years ago
Help please i need it asap
mojhsa [17]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

B, because if u subtract the forces from each other the forward one outweights the other ones

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!ASAP!!! Wet Lab - Coulomb's Law lab from edge!!
snow_tiger [21]

Answer:

h

Explanation:

Coulomb's law, or Coulomb's inverse-square law, is an experimental law[1] of physics that quantifies the amount of force between two stationary, electrically charged particles. The electric force between charged bodies at rest is conventionally called electrostatic force or Coulomb force.[2] The law was first discovered in 1785 by French physicist Charles-Augustin de Coulomb, hence the name. Coulomb's law was essential to the development of the theory of electromagnetism, maybe even its starting point,[1] as it made it possible to discuss the quantity of electric charge in a meaningful way.[3]

The law states that the magnitude of the electrostatic force of attraction or repulsion between two point charges is directly proportional to the product of the magnitudes of charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them,[4]

{\displaystyle F=k_{\text{e}}{\frac {q_{1}q_{2}}{r^{2}}}}{\displaystyle F=k_{\text{e}}{\frac {q_{1}q_{2}}{r^{2}}}}

Here, ke is Coulomb's constant (ke ≈ 8.988×109 N⋅m2⋅C−2),[1] q1 and q2 are the signed magnitudes of the charges, and the scalar r is the distance between the charges.

The force is along the straight line joining the two charges. If the charges have the same sign, the electrostatic force between them is repulsive; if they have different signs, the force between them is attractive.

Being an inverse-square law, the law is analogous to Isaac Newton's inverse-square law of universal gravitation, but gravitational forces are always attractive, while electrostatic forces can be attractive or repulsive.[2] Coulomb's law can be used to derive Gauss's law, and vice versa. In the case of a single stationary point charge, the two laws are equivalent, expressing the same physical law in different ways.[5] The law has been tested extensively, and observations have upheld the law on the scale from 10−16 m to 108 m.[5]

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If an antelope can run 14.1 km in 39 min, how fast is it km/h(for reference , 110 km/h is 65 mph )
    8·2 answers
  • Suppose a vertebra is subjected to a shearing force of 420 N. Find the shear deformation in m, taking the vertebra to be a cylin
    6·1 answer
  • 3 objects that have gravitational potential energy?
    5·2 answers
  • What is the speed of sound in air at 40°C? 355 m/s 307 m/s 331 m/s 239 m/s
    12·2 answers
  • Why are multiple trials important when carrying out an experiment?
    5·1 answer
  • Nuclear reactions, such as fusion and fission, convert
    13·1 answer
  • A 1870 kg car traveling at 13.5 m/s collides with a 2970 kg car that is initally at rest at a stoplight. The cars stick together
    15·1 answer
  • Many streets and parking lots are illuminated with ???
    12·2 answers
  • The index of refraction of quartz is anisotropic. Suppose that visible light is passing from one grain to another of different c
    9·1 answer
  • How much more heat is transferred from the ocean to the atmosphere as latent heat rather than as sensible heat
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!