All categories

3 years ago

6.02 x 109 = hellllppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp

Chemistry

2 answers:

worty [1.4K]3 years ago

6 0

=656.18 thts what you get if you know math hahah

mojhsa [17]3 years ago

5 0

The answer is 656.18
6.02 x 109 = 656.18

You might be interested in

ASAP I AM GIVING BRAINLIEST PLEASEEEEEEEEE HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

zepelin [54]

Answer:

Explanation:

In the example, the amount of hydrogen is 202,650 x 0.025 / 293.15 x 8.314472 = 2.078 moles. Use the mass of the hydrogen gas to calculate the gas moles directly; divide the hydrogen weight by its molar mass of 2 g/mole. For example, 250 grams (g) of the hydrogen gas corresponds to 250 g / 2 g/mole = 125 moles.

7 0

3 years ago

What are three ways we can measure sustainability while evaluating whether to buy a product?

jek_recluse [69]

Answer:

Environmental, Economic, and Societal Impacts

Explanation:

If the product is popular it'll be on social media...

If it helps you in some way it is useful, and probably needed

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What happens when an electron in its lowest energy level or ground state when it is by absorbs energy?

tester [92]

Explanation:

atom changes from a ground state to an excited state by taking on energy from its surroundings in a process called absorption. The electron absorbs the energy and jumps to a higher energy level. In the reverse process, emission, the electron returns to the ground state by releasing the extra energy it absorbed

8 0

3 years ago

I WILL MARK BRAINLISET FOR WHOEVER GETS THIS RIGHT! A pot is placed on a gas flame, and the water inside the pot begins to boil.

NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

B. Warm water rises within the pot.?

Explanation

<em>There wasn't enough information given for me to safely determine the correct answer.</em>

8 0

3 years ago

A 0.4647-g sample of a compound known to contain only carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen was burned in oxygen to yield 0.01962 mol of

Stella [2.4K]

Answer:

See explanation.

Explanation:

Hello,

In this case, we can show how the empirical formula is found by following the shown below procedure:

1. Compute the moles of carbon in carbon dioxide as the only source of carbon at the products:

$n_C=0.01962molCO_2*\frac{1molC}{1molCO_2} =0.01962molC$

2. Compute the moles of hydrogen in water as the only source of hydrogen at the products:

$n_H=0.01961molH_2O*\frac{2molH}{1molH_2O}=0.03922molH$

3. Compute the mass of oxygen by subtracting the mass of both carbon and hydrogen from the 0.4647-g sample:

$m_O=0.4647g-0.01962molC*\frac{12gC}{1molC}-0.03922molH*\frac{1gH}{1molH} =0.1900gO$

4. Compute the moles of oxygen by using its molar mass:

$n_O=0.1900gO*\frac{1molO}{16gO}=0.01188molO$

5. Divide the moles of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen by the moles of oxygen (smallest one) to find the subscripts in the empirical formula:

$C=\frac{0.01962}{0.01188}=1.65\\ \\H=\frac{0.03922}{0.01188} =3.3\\\\O=\frac{0.01188}{0.01188} =1$

6. Search for the closest whole number (in this case multiply by 2):

$C_3H_6O_2$

Moreover, the empirical formula suggests this compound could be carboxylic acid since it has two oxygen atoms, nevertheless, this is not true since the molar mass is 222.27 g/mol, therefore, we should compute the molar mass of the empirical formula, that is:

$M=12*3+1*6+16*2=74g/mol$

Which is about three times in the molecular formula, for that reason, the actual formula is:

$C_9H_{18}O_6$

It suggest that the compound has a highly oxidizing character due to the presence of oxygen, therefore, we cannot predict the distribution of the functional groups as it could contain, carboxyl, carbonyl, hydroxyl or even peroxi.

Best regards.

6 0

3 years ago