Which of these structures is an architect most likely to design?

A 645-turn coil with a 20.250 m 2 area is spun in Earth’s 5.00×10 −5 T magnetic field, producing a 1.25-V maximum emf. A

Dmitriy789 [7]

Answer:

$\omega = 1.914\ rad/s$

Explanation:

Given,

Number of turns, N = 645 N

Area, A = 20.25 m²

Earth Magnetic field, B = 5 x 10⁻⁵ T

Maximum Emf = 1.25 V.

Angular velocity, ω = ?

Using Induced Emf formula

$\varepsilon = NAB\omega$

$\omega= \dfrac{\varepsilon}{NAB}$

$\omega= \dfrac{1.25}{645\times 20.25\times 5\times 10^{-5}}$

$\omega = 1.914\ rad/s$

Angular velocity of the coil = $\omega = 1.914\ rad/s$

5 0

4 years ago

A pendulum swings in an arc in which each successive swing is 40% as long as the previous swing. if the first swing covers an ar

nlexa [21]

The situation given above is that of the geometric sequence with first term equal to 75 meters and the common ratio equal to 0.40. The sum of the terms for an infinite geometric sequence is expressed in the equation,
S = a1/(1 - r)
Substituting,
S = (75 m) / (1 - 0.4) = 125 m
Therefore, the total distance that the pendulum had swung before finally coming to rest is 125 m.

8 0

4 years ago

star a and star b have measured stellar parallax of 0.58 arc second and 0.73 arc second, respectively. which star is closer?

goldenfox [79]

Star B is closer than star A, because 1/ 0.58 = 1.72 pc, while 1/.73 = 1.36 pc.

<h3>What is stellar parallax and distance measurement using stellar parallax?</h3>

To calculate the distances to nearby stars, astronomers employ a phenomenon known as parallax. The apparent displacement of an object due to a change in the viewer's point of view is known as parallax. The distances between close stars can be calculated using this phenomenon. A nearer star will seem to move against the farther-off background stars as the Earth revolves around the Sun. By measuring a star's position once, then again six months later, astronomers can establish the apparent shift in location of that star. The apparent motion of the star is referred to as stellar parallax.

A straightforward correlation exists between the distance of a star and parallax angle:

$d=\frac{1}{p}$

The distance d and parallax angle p are both measured in parsecs and arcseconds, respectively.

Stellar parallax of star A= 0.58 arcseconds

Stellar parallax of star B= 0.73 arcseconds

So, on applying the formula,

The distance of the star A= 1.72pc

And the distance of the star B= 1.36pc

Therefore, star B is closer than star A.

To know more about stellar parallax, visit:

brainly.com/question/29352944

#SPJ4

3 0

1 year ago

If the area is 2 square meters (2 m²), what's the force of gravity acting on the column of water?

-Dominant- [34]

What area ?

What column of water ?

6 0

3 years ago

Do you believe that global warming is happening? Tell why or why not. If you believe global warming is happening, what can we do

adoni [48]

Answer:

Yes I do believe global warming is happening, mainly because there is a plethora of data and research from scientists to support the claim. The effects of global warming around us are clearly observed as well, such as the rise in acidity in the oceans. Another example is in the Artic, where a natural occurence takes place. Ice freezes and cold salty water takes its place, and because of it's high density it sinks and sweeps across the ocean floor. That cold water is then replaced by warmer water, and this is called the global ocean conveyor belt. As seen through the example with the Artic, ocean temperature plays a key role in the conveyor belt. Climate change is fueled through human activities, which could harm the system. If one part of the conveyor belt were to break down, such as the one in the Artic, nutrients will not be distributed to start the food chain. Organisms such as phytoplankton need those nutrients to thrive. If phytoplankton are endangered, all life in the oceans is endangered. So as we can see, global warming is extremely harmful to the environment and it's effects are observed around us.

To slow global warming down we should consume less meat, and go to vegan or vegetarian diets. Your carbon footprint is halved by consuming less meat and eating a more vegan or vegetarian diet. Another thing is that we as a society should stop using so much plastic. It takes more than a century to degrade, most landfills are composed of it. Microplastics also get into our oceans, and our fish end up consuming them.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago