Answer:
25.08m/s
Explanation:
mgh1 + 0.5mv1² = mgh2 + 0.5mv2²
h1 = 0m
v1 = u
h2 = 5m
v2 = 23m/s
putting the values into the formula above;
m(10)(0) + 0.5m(u²) = m(10)(5) + 0.5m(23²)
0 + 0.5mu² = 50m + 264.5m
0.5mu² = 314.5m
dividing through by m
0.5u² = 314.5
u² = 629
u = <u>2</u><u>5</u><u>.</u><u>0</u><u>8</u><u>m</u><u>/</u><u>s</u>
<u>Theref</u><u>ore</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>init</u><u>ial</u><u> </u><u>speed</u><u> </u><u>"</u><u>u</u><u>"</u><u> </u><u>=</u><u> </u><u>2</u><u>5</u><u>m</u><u>/</u><u>s</u>
Answer:
No, it is not proper to use an infinitely long cylinder model when finding the temperatures near the bottom or top surfaces of a cylinder.
Explanation:
A cylinder is said to be infinitely long when is of a sufficient length. Also, when the diameter of the cylinder is relatively small compared to the length, it is called infinitely long cylinder.
Cylindrical rods can also be treated as infinitely long when dealing with heat transfers at locations far from the top or bottom surfaces. However, it not proper to treat the cylinder as being infinitely long when:
* When the diameter and length are comparable (i.e have the same measurement)
When finding the temperatures near the bottom or top of a cylinder, it is NOT PROPER TO USE AN INFINITELY LONG CYLINDER because heat transfer at those locations can be two-dimensional.
Therefore, the answer to the question is NO, since it is not proper to use an infinitely long cylinder when finding temperatures near the bottom or top of a cylinder.
Answer:
HERE IS YOUR ANSWER
Explanation:
PLEASE MARK MY ANSWER AS BRAINLIEST IF THE ANSWERS ARE CORRECT .
Beacuse of the loose connection of the wire .
Straight
Answer:
ok i searched it up in google and it showed links XDDDD
Explanation:
