Answer:
Alice is correct.
The loop are dependent.
Explanation:
for(i = 1; i <= N; i = (i*2)+17 )
for(k = i+1; k <= i+N; k = k+1) // notice i in i+1 and i+N
printf("B")
This is a nested for-loop.
After the first for-loop opening, there is no block of statement to be executed rather a for-loop is called again. And the second for-loop uses the value of i from the first for-loop. The value of N is both called from outside the loop.
So, the second for-loop depend on the first for loop to get the value of i. For clarity purpose, code indentation or use of curly brace is advised.
Answer:A. No one has ever beat Nancy.
Explanation:
The dormain of discourse in a simple language is the set of entities upon which our discussions are based when discussing about something.
The dormain of discourse is also known simply as universe, can also be said to be a set of entities o
upon which certain variables of interest in some formal treatment may range.
The dormain of discourse is generally attributed to Augustus De Morgan, it was also extensively used by George Boole in his Laws of Thought.
THE LOGICAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE THE QUESTION IS THAT NO ONE HAS EVER BEAT NANCY.
Ik i am thank you tho xoxo
Answer:
b. the supremacy clause
Explanation:
This is clearly a violation of the supremacy clause of the constitution. The supremacy clause makes the constitution and federal laws made under the constitutional authority the supreme law of the united state. And in a case where there is a conflicting state law, as we have here with Oregon, the federal law is supposed to take priority.
So in this case where the federal law and the state law do not agree, the feral law has the power to override the law of the state. So oregon has violated the supremacy clause
