If they were not repeatable people would think the experiment is not accurate. If it can be repeated than the data can prove a very valid point.
It seems more and more there are fewer conservation organizations who speak for the forest, and more that speak for the timber industry. Witness several recent commentaries in Oregon papers that are by no means unique. I’ve seen similar themes from other conservation groups across the West in recent years.
Many conservation groups have uncritically adopted views that support more logging of our public lands based upon increasingly disputed ideas about forest health and fire ecology, as well as the age-old bias against natural processes like wildfire and beetles.
For instance, an article in the Portland Oregonian quotes Oregon Wild’s executive director Sean Stevens bemoaning the closure of a timber mill in John Day Oregon. Stevens said: “Loss of the 29-year-old Malheur Lumber Co. mill would be ‘a sad turn of events’” Surprisingly, Oregon Wild is readily supporting federal subsidies to promote more logging on the Malheur National Forest to sustain the mill.
Answer:I can't see any question
Answer:
2.25 M is the final concentration of hydroxide ions ions in the solution after the reaction has gone to completion.
Explanation:
Moles of NaOH = 
Molarity of the nitric acid solution = 0.250 M
Volume of the nitric solution = 0.150 L
Moles of nitric acid = n
According to reaction, 1 mole of nitric acid recats with 1 mole of NaOH, then 0.0375 moles of nitric acid will react with :
of NaOH
Moles of NaOH left unreacted in the solution =
= 0.375 mol - 0.0375 mol = 0.3375 mol
1 mole of sodium hydroxide gives 1 mol of sodium ions and 1 mole of hydroxide ions.
Then 0.3375 moles of NaOH will give :
of hydroxide ion
The molarity of hydroxide ion in solution ;
2.25 M is the final concentration of hydroxide ions ions in the solution after the reaction has gone to completion.
