1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
raketka [301]
3 years ago
5

H. The length of the shadow is different in evening and in the day. Justify​

Physics
2 answers:
Goshia [24]3 years ago
5 0
The shadow are exactly the same length
Vinvika [58]3 years ago
3 0

the shadows are exactly the same length in the morning as they are in the evening.

 is so obvious it’s that when the sun is low you get long shadows and when the sun is up in the sky like in the noon the shadow is shorter.

You might be interested in
What happens if you drop a chicken wing from the top of the Eiffel Tower
horsena [70]

Answer:

It either goes WEEEEEEE. Or it just breaks apart.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Outside a spherically symmetric charge distribution of net charge Q, Gauss's law can be used to show that the electric field at
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

Q at the center of the distribution.

Explanation:

  • The Gauss's law is the law that relates to the distribution of electrical charges to the resulting electrical field. It states that a flux of electricity outside the arabatory closed surface is proportional to the electricitical harg enclosed by the surface.
3 0
3 years ago
Name any two liquid which are found in our human eyes​
Romashka [77]

Aqueous humor and vitreous humor are the liquids present in the human eye.

<em>Hope </em><em>it</em><em> helped</em><em> you</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>pls </em><em>mark</em><em> brainliest</em>

8 0
2 years ago
Two traveling sinusoidal waves are described by the wave functions y1 = 4.85 sin [(4.35x − 1270t)] y2 = 4.85 sin [(4.35x − 1270t
Tamiku [17]

Answer:

Approximately 9.62.

Explanation:

y_1 = 4.85\, \sin[(4.35\, x - 1270\, t) + 0].

y_2 = 4.85\, \sin[(4.35\, x - 1270\, t) + (-0.250)].

Notice that sine waves y_1 and y_2 share the same frequency and wavelength. The only distinction between these two waves is the (-0.250) in y_2\!.

Therefore, the sum (y_1 + y_2) would still be a sine wave. The amplitude of (y_1 + y_2)\! could be found without using calculus.

Consider the sum-of-angle identity for sine:

\sin(a + b) = \sin(a) \cdot \cos(b) + \cos(a) \cdot \sin(b).

Compare the expression \sin(a + b) to y_2. Let a = (4.35\, x - 1270) and b = (-0.250). Apply the sum-of-angle identity of sine to rewrite y_2\!.

\begin{aligned}y_2 &= 4.85\, \sin[(\underbrace{4.35\, x - 1270\, t}_{a}) + (\underbrace{-0.250}_{b})]\\ &= 4.85 \, [\sin(4.35\, x - 1270\, t)\cdot \cos(-0.250) \\ &\quad\quad\quad\; + \cos(4.35\, x - 1270\, t)\cdot \sin(-0.250)] \end{aligned}.

Therefore, the sum (y_1 + y_2) would become:

\begin{aligned}& y_1 + y_2\\[0.5em] &= 4.85\, [\sin(4.35\, x - 1270\, t) \\ &\quad \quad \quad\;+\sin(4.35\, x - 1270\, t)\cdot \cos(-0.250) \\ &\quad\quad\quad\; + \cos(4.35\, x - 1270\, t)\cdot \sin(-0.250)] \\[0.5em] &= 4.85\, [\sin(4.35\, x - 1270\, t)\cdot (1 + \cos(-0.250)) \\ &\quad\quad\quad\; + \cos(4.35\, x - 1270\, t)\cdot \sin(-0.250)] \end{aligned}.

Consider: would it be possible to find m and c that satisfy the following hypothetical equation?

\begin{aligned}& (4.85\, m)\cdot \sin((4.35\, x - 1270\, t) + c)\\&= 4.85\, [\sin(4.35\, x - 1270\, t)\cdot (1 + \cos(-0.250)) \\ &\quad\quad\quad\; + \cos(4.35\, x - 1270\, t)\cdot \sin(-0.250)] \end{aligned}.

Simplify this hypothetical equation:

\begin{aligned}& m\cdot \sin((4.35\, x - 1270\, t) + c)\\&=\sin(4.35\, x - 1270\, t)\cdot (1 + \cos(-0.250)) \\ &\quad\quad + \cos(4.35\, x - 1270\, t)\cdot \sin(-0.250)\end{aligned}.

Apply the sum-of-angle identity of sine to rewrite the left-hand side:

\begin{aligned}& m\cdot \sin((4.35\, x - 1270\, t) + c)\\[0.5em]&=m\, \sin(4.35\, x - 1270\, t)\cdot \cos(c) \\ &\quad\quad + m\, \cos(4.35\, x - 1270\, t)\cdot \sin(c) \\[0.5em] &=\sin(4.35\, x - 1270\, t)\cdot (m\, \cos(c)) \\ &\quad\quad + \cos(4.35\, x - 1270\, t)\cdot (m\, \sin(c)) \end{aligned}.

Compare this expression with the right-hand side. For this hypothetical equation to hold for all real x and t, the following should be satisfied:

\displaystyle 1 + \cos(-0.250) = m\, \cos(c), and

\displaystyle \sin(-0.250) = m\, \sin(c).

Consider the Pythagorean identity. For any real number a:

{\left(\sin(a)\right)}^{2} + {\left(\cos(a)\right)}^{2} = 1^2.

Make use of the Pythagorean identity to solve this system of equations for m. Square both sides of both equations:

\displaystyle 1 + 2\, \cos(-0.250) +  {\left(\cos(-0.250)\right)}^2= m^2\, {\left(\cos(c)\right)}^2.

\displaystyle {\left(\sin(-0.250)\right)}^{2} = m^2\, {\left(\sin(c)\right)}^2.

Take the sum of these two equations.

Left-hand side:

\begin{aligned}& 1 + 2\, \cos(-0.250) + \underbrace{{\left(\cos(-0.250)\right)}^2 + {\left(\sin(-0.250)\right)}^2}_{1}\\ &= 1 + 2\, \cos(-0.250) + 1 \\ &= 2 + 2\, \cos(-0.250) \end{aligned}.

Right-hand side:

\begin{aligned} &m^2\, {\left(\cos(c)\right)}^2 + m^2\, {\left(\sin(c)\right)}^2 \\ &= m^2\, \left( {\left(\sin(c)\right)}^2 +  {\left(\cos(c)\right)}^2\right)\\ &= m^2\end{aligned}.

Therefore:

m^2 = 2 + 2\, \cos(-0.250).

m = \sqrt{2 + 2\, \cos(-0.250)} \approx 1.98.

Substitute m = \sqrt{2 + 2\, \cos(-0.250)} back to the system to find c. However, notice that the exact value of c\! isn't required for finding the amplitude of (y_1 + y_2) = (4.85\, m)\cdot \sin((4.35\, x - 1270\, t) + c).

(Side note: one possible value of c is \displaystyle \arccos\left(\frac{1 + \cos(0.250)}{\sqrt{2 \times (1 + \cos(0.250))}}\right) \approx 0.125 radians.)

As long as \! c is a real number, the amplitude of (y_1 + y_2) = (4.85\, m)\cdot \sin((4.35\, x - 1270\, t) + c) would be equal to the absolute value of (4.85\, m).

Therefore, the amplitude of (y_1 + y_2) would be:

\begin{aligned}|4.85\, m| &= 4.85 \times \sqrt{2 + 2\, \cos(-0.250)} \\&\approx 9.62 \end{aligned}.

8 0
3 years ago
What is the temperature 32 degrees Fahrenheit in degrees Celsius? A. 0°C B. 20°C C. 10°C D. –10°C
omeli [17]
The answer would 0. The reasoning of this is because freezing point in celsius is always 0 degrees but in fahrenheit the freezing point is 32 degrees.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Hey guys.. what’s 1,893,9379 x 0
    7·1 answer
  • A 2kg box is pushed along a flat frictionless surface with an applied force of 53.91newton j+19.62 j were j is horizontal and j
    5·1 answer
  • Using component notation, enter the vector B⃗ B→B_vec in the answer box. Enter your answer as a pair of vector components, separ
    6·1 answer
  • Why does erosion always lead to deposition?
    15·1 answer
  • What is the name given to the semiconductor device that has three or more elements?
    5·1 answer
  • The volume of a cube is 512 cm3. What would change if the volume of the cube were measured in cubic meters?. . A.. The volume of
    13·2 answers
  • A box is released from rest and allowed to slide down a ramp with friction. Which statement most accurately describes the energy
    9·1 answer
  • A system dissipates 12 JJ of heat into the surroundings; meanwhile, 28 JJ of work is done on the system. What is the change of t
    7·1 answer
  • As wavelength decreases, frequency and energy _________________;
    10·1 answer
  • Newton’s Third Law:
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!