Answer: i can see if i can what is the problem
Explanation:
Complete question:
A structural component in the form of a wide plate is to be fabricated from a steel alloy that has a plane strain fracture toughness of 98.9 MPa root m (90 ksi root in.) and a yield strength of 860 MPa (125,000 psi). The flaw size resolution limit of the flaw detection apparatus is 3.0 mm (0.12 in.). If the design stress is one-half of the yield strength and the value of Y is 1.0, determine whether or not a critical flaw for this plate is subject to detection.
Answer:
Since the flaw 17mm is greater than 3 mm the critical flaw for this plate is subject to detection
so that critical flow is subject to detection
Explanation:
We are given:
Plane strain fracture toughness K 
Yield strength Y = 860 MPa
Flaw detection apparatus = 3.0mm (12in)
y = 1.0
Let's use the expression:

We already know
K= design
a = length of surface creak
Since we are to find the length of surface creak, we will make "a" subject of the formula in the expression above.
Therefore
![a= \frac{1}{pi} * [\frac{k}{y*a}]^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20a%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bpi%7D%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bk%7D%7By%2Aa%7D%5D%5E2%20)
Substituting figures in the expression above, we have:
![= \frac{1}{pi} * [\frac{98.9 MPa \sqrt{m}} {10 * \frac{860MPa}{2}}]^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bpi%7D%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B98.9%20MPa%20%5Csqrt%7Bm%7D%7D%20%7B10%20%2A%20%5Cfrac%7B860MPa%7D%7B2%7D%7D%5D%5E2)
= 0.0168 m
= 17mm
Therefore, since the flaw 17mm > 3 mm the critical flow is subject to detection
Answer:
Superficial design improvements are typically only trivial changes to a design, while functional design improvements can change the way a product or process is used to significantly enhance performance.
Explanation:
As a PC board designer, I would sometimes spend a certain amount of time making traces have shorter routes, or fewer layer changes or bends. (I wanted to make the layout "pretty.") In some cases, these changes are superficial, affecting the appearance only. In some cases, they are functional, reducing crosstalk or emissions or susceptibility to interference.
I deal with a web site that seems to be changing all the time (Brainly). In many cases, the same information is rearranged on the page—a superficial change. In other cases, the information being displayed changes, or the way that certain information is accessed changes. These are functional changes. (Sometimes, they "enhance performance," and sometimes they don't, IMO.)
In short ...
<em>Superficial design improvements are typically only trivial changes to a design, while functional design improvements can change the way a product or process is used to significantly enhance performance.</em>
Answer:
Mechanical Efficiency = 83.51%
Explanation:
Given Data:
Pressure difference = ΔP=1.2 Psi
Flow rate = 
Power of Pump = 3 hp
Required:
Mechanical Efficiency
Solution:
We will first bring the change the units of given data into SI units.

Now we will find the change in energy.
Since it is mentioned in the statement that change in elevation (potential energy) and change in velocity (Kinetic Energy) are negligible.
Thus change in energy is

As we know that Mass = Volume x density
substituting the value
Energy = Volume * density x ΔP / density
Change in energy = Volumetric flow x ΔP
Change in energy = 0.226 x 8.274 = 1.869 KW
Now mechanical efficiency = change in energy / work done by shaft
Efficiency = 1.869 / 2.238
Efficiency = 0.8351 = 83.51%
Answer:
A) Wet bulb temperature of #1 is less than that of #2
Explanation:
This can be gotten from pinpointing the states of the two containers on a psychometric chart.