Answers is F=7.84 N
Friction force resists the effect of horizontal force and trying to approch to a limiting force.
we have formula for limiting friction force between block and floor
F=Ц N
where N=mg
putting values we get answer.
The density of the nickel was greater than that of the quarter and penny, thus, the results supports the hypothesis.
<h3>What is density of substance?</h3>
The density of a substance is a measure of how tightly-packed the particles of the substance are.
Density is calculated as the ratio of the mass of the substance and the volume of the substance.
The hypothesis of the lab to compare the densities of a penny, a nickel, and a quarter is:
- If the nickel has a greater density than the quarter and penny, then it will have a greater mass to volume ratio. If the nickel has a lower density than the quarter and penny, then it will have a lower mass-to-volume ratio.
The average mass and the average volume of a penny, a nickel, and a quarter are then used to determine the density of each coin.
Based on obtained results, it would be found that the density of the nickel was greater than that of the quarter and penny. Therefore, the results supports the hypothesis.
In conclusion, the density of a substance depends on the mass and the volume.
Learn more about density at: brainly.com/question/1354972
#SPJ1
Answer:
The required angular speed the neutron star is 10992.32 rad/s
Explanation:
Given the data in the question;
mass of the sun M
= 1.99 × 10³⁰ kg
Mass of the neutron star
M
= 2( M
)
M
= 2( 1.99 × 10³⁰ kg )
M
= ( 3.98 × 10³⁰ kg )
Radius of neutron star R
= 13.0 km = 13 × 10³ m
Now, let mass of a small object on the neutron star be m
angular speed be ω
.
During rotational motion, the gravitational force on the object supplies the necessary centripetal force.
GmM
= / R
² = mR
ω
²
ω
² = GM
= / R
³
ω
= √(GM
= / R
³)
we know that gravitational G = 6.67 × 10⁻¹¹ Nm²/kg²
we substitute
ω
= √( ( 6.67 × 10⁻¹¹ )( 3.98 × 10³⁰ ) ) / (13 × 10³ )³)
ω
= √( 2.65466 × 10²⁰ / 2.197 × 10¹²
ω
= √ 120831133.3636777
ω
= 10992.32 rad/s
Therefore, The required angular speed the neutron star is 10992.32 rad/s
the anwser is c is always the best anwser
The answer is a matter of opinion, and you're going to get different answers
from different people. Here's <u>my</u> take on it:
The writers, producers and advertising sponsors of these shows certainly
don't think they're boring. And <em><u>definitely</u></em> neither do the TV networks that
decide which ones to broadcast.
I'm not trying to say "The experts don't think they're boring, so you must
be wrong". I'm trying to say that different people have different opinions
about the same shows, and in <em>your</em> case,<em> you</em> find them boring.
My conclusion is this:
I think you're finding TV shows boring nowadays because you're growing
as a person. You've grown, developed, and matured to the point where
you're above the level of audience that the shows are pitched for. That's
a very good thing !
You're sad because you used to get pleasure and entertainment from TV,
and now it doesn't give you those things. That's like losing an old friend,
that you used to have such fun playing with, but he just doesn't do it for
you any more.
Now that you've grown up, you've made new friends. With them, you do
things that you wouldn't even understand with your younger friends. And
you develop new interests, like ... I don't know ... books, movies, hobbies,
your church, your profession, learning new things, developing new skills,
exercising your brain, writing, volunteer work, ham radio, building fine
furniture, singing, learning to write music, raising tropical plants, sculpture,
politics ... whatever turns you on. Some people never grow past the stage
where staring at the tube is all they need in life, because they don't have
what it takes to be interested in anything else. Those are the people that
TV is aimed at. But you have more, and that's why TV isn't enough for you.
There are other possible reasons why TV bores you. But until I know more
about you, I think it's a very, very good sign.