Answer:
165 mm
Explanation:
The mass on the piston will apply a pressure on the oil. This is:
p = f / A
The force is the weight of the mass
f = m * a
Where a in the acceleration of gravity
A is the area of the piston
A = π/4 * D1^2
Then:
p = m * a / (π/4 * D1^2)
The height the oil will raise is the heignt of a colum that would create that same pressure at its base:
p = f / A
The weight of the column is:
f = m * a
The mass of the column is its volume multiplied by its specific gravity
m = V * S
The volume is the base are by the height
V = A * h
Then:
p = A * h * S * a / A
We cancel the areas:
p = h * S * a
Now we equate the pressures form the piston and the pil column:
m * a / (π/4 * D1^2) = h * S * a
We simplify the acceleration of gravity
m / (π/4 * D1^2) = h * S
Rearranging:
h = m / (π/4 * D1^2 * S)
Now, h is the heigth above the interface between the piston and the oil, this is at h1 = 42 mm. The total height is
h2 = h + h1
h2 = h1 + m / (π/4 * D1^2 * S)
h2 = 0.042 + 10 / (π/4 * 0.14^2 * 0.8) = 0.165 m = 165 mm
3-SAT ≤p TSP
If P ¹ NP, then no NP-complete problem can be solved in polynomial time.
both the statements are true.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- 3-SAT ≤p TSP due to any complete problem of NP to other problem by exits of reductions.
- If P ¹ NP, then 3-SAT ≤p 2-SAT are the polynomial time algorithm are not for 3-SAT. In P, 2-SAT is found, 3- SAT polynomial time algorithm implies the exit of reductions. 3 SAT does not have polynomial time algorithm when P≠NP.
- If P ¹ NP, then no NP-complete problem can be solved in polynomial time. because for the NP complete problem individually gets the polynomial time algorithm for the others. It may be in P for all the problems, the implication of latter is P≠NP.
Answer:
please mark me as a brainleast
Explanation:
hahahahhahaahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhhahhhahaahahhaahhhahahaah
Answer:
Chemical Engineer,Geological Engineer,Aerospace Engineer
Explanation:
