All categories

3 years ago

I need help with this question please

Engineering

1 answer:

solniwko [45]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The resultant moment is 477.84 N·m

Explanation:

We note that the resultant moment is given by the moment about a given point

The length of the sides of the formed triangles are;

l = sin(40°) × 4/sin(110°) ≈ 2.736

Taking the moment about the lower left hand corner of the figure, with the convention that clockwise moments are positive, we have;

The resultant moment, ∑m, is given as follow;

∑M = 250 N × 4 m + 400 N × cos(40°) × 4 m - 400 N × cos(40°) × 2 m + 400 N × sin(40°) × 2 m × tan(40°) - 600 N × cos(40°) × 2 m - 600 N× sin(40°) × 2 m × tan(40°) = 477.837084 N·m

Therefore, the resultant moment, ∑m ≈ 477.84 N·m clockwise.

You might be interested in

Give me uses of a grinding machine in agriculture.

Tju [1.3M]

Answer:

The grinding machine is used for roughing and finishing flat, cylindrical, and conical surfaces; finishing internal cylinders or bores; forming and sharpening cutting tools; snagging or removing rough projections from castings and stampings; and cleaning, polishing, and buffing surfaces.

4 0

2 years ago

A pitfall cited in Section 1.10 is expecting to improve the overall performance of a computer by improving only one aspect of th

Oxana [17]

Answer:

a) For this case the new time to run the FP operation would be reduced 20% so that means 100-20% =80% from the original time

$(1-0.2)*70 s =56s$

The reduction on this case is $70-56 s=14s$

And since the new total time would be given by $250-14=236 s$

b) For this case the total time is reduced 20% so that means that the new total time would be (1-0.2)=0.8 times the original total time $(1-0.2) *250s =200 s$

The original time for INT operations is calculated as:

$250 = 70+85+40 +t_{INT}$

$t_{INT}=55s$

For this part the only time that was changed is assumed the INT operations so then:

$200 = 70+85+40 \Delta t_{INT}$

And then: $\Delta t_{INT}= 200-70-85-40=5 s$

c) A reduction of the total time implies that the total time would be 205 s from the results above. And the time for FP is 70, for L/S is 85 and for INT operations is 55 s, so then if we add 70+85+55=210s, we see that 210>205 so then we cannot reduce the total time 20% just reducing the branch intructions.

Explanation:

From the info given we know that a computer running a program that requires 250 s, with 70 s spent executing FP instructions, 85 s executed L/S instructions and 40 s spent executing branch instructions.

Part 1

For this case the new time to run the FP operation would be reduced 20% so that means 100-20% =80% from the original time

$(1-0.2)*70 s =56s$

The reduction on this case is $70-56 s=14s$

And since the new total time would be given by $250-14=236 s$

Part 2

For this case the total time is reduced 20% so that means that the new total time would be (1-0.2)=0.8 times the original total time $(1-0.2) *250s =200 s$

The original time for INT operations is calculated as:

$250 = 70+85+40 +t_{INT}$

$t_{INT}=55s$

For this part the only time that was changed is assumed the INT operations so then:

$200 = 70+85+40 \Delta t_{INT}$

And then: $\Delta t_{INT}= 200-70-85-40=5 s$

And we can quantify the decrease using the relative change:

$\% Change = \frac{5s}{55 s} *100 = 9.09\%$ of reduction

Part 3

A reduction of the total time implies that the total time would be 205 s from the results above. And the time for FP is 70, for L/S is 85 and for INT operations is 55 s, so then if we add 70+85+55=210s, we see that 210>205 so then we cannot reduce the total time 20% just reducing the branch intructions.

8 0

3 years ago

The following electrical characteristics have been determined for both intrinsic and p-type extrinsic gallium antimonide (GaSb)

xxTIMURxx [149]

Answer:

0.5m^2/Vs and 0.14m^2/Vs

Explanation:

To calculate the mobility of electron and mobility of hole for gallium antimonide we have,

$\sigma = n|e|\mu_e+p|e|\mu_h$ (S)

Where

e= charge of electron

n= number of electrons

p= number of holes

$\mu_e=$ mobility of electron

$\mu_h=$ mobility of holes

$\sigma =$ electrical conductivity

Making the substitution in (S)

Mobility of electron

$8.9*10^4=(8.7*10^{23}*(-1.602*10^{-19})*\mu_e)+(8.7*10^{23}*(-1.602*10^{-19})*\mu_h)$

$0.639=\mu_e+\mu_h$

Mobility of hole in (S)

$2.3*10^5 = (7.6*10^{22}*(-1.602*10^{-19})*\mu_e)+(1*10^{25}*(-1.602*10^{-19}*\mu_h))$

$0.1436 = 7.6*10^{-3}\mu_e+\mu_h$

Then, solving the equation:

$0.639=\mu_e+\mu_h$ (1)

$0.1436 = 7.6*10^{-3}\mu_e+\mu_h$ (2)

We have,

Mobility of electron $\mu_e = 0.5m^2/V.s$

Mobility of hole is $\mu_h = 0.14m^2/V.s$

6 0

3 years ago

Discuss typical advantages and disadvantages of an irrigation system?

trapecia [35]

Advantages include low costs and minimal labor.Water stays in the root zone, and foliage stays dry. Drawbacks to surface irrigation include potential overwatering and wasteful runoff.

4 0

3 years ago

Maximum iorsional shear siress.? Select one: a)- occurs at the center of a shaft. b)- occurs at the outer surface of a shaft c)-

pickupchik [31]

Answer:

b). Occurs at the outer surface of the shaft

Explanation:

We know from shear stress and torque relationship, we know that

$\frac{T}{J}= \frac{\tau }{r}$

where, T = torque

J = polar moment of inertia of shaft

τ = torsional shear stress

r = raduis of the shaft

Therefore from the above relation we see that

$\tau = \frac{T.r}{J}$

Thus torsional shear stress, τ is directly proportional to the radius,r of the shaft.

When r= 0, then τ = 0

and when r = R , τ is maximum

Thus, torsional shear stress is maximum at the outer surface of the shaft.

4 0

3 years ago