Answer:
101.63° C
Explanation:
Volume expansivity γa = γr - γ g = 18 × 10⁻⁵ - 2.0 × 10⁻⁵ = 16 × 10⁻⁵ /K
v₂ - v₁ / v₁θ = 16 × 10⁻⁵ /K
(500 - 492 ) mL / (492 × 16 × 10⁻⁵) = θ
θ = 101.63° C
Answer:
71 Ga has a naturally abundance of 36%
Explanation:
Step 1: Given data
Gallium has 2 naturally occurring isotopes: this means the abundance of the 2 isotopes together is 100 %. The atomic weight of Ga is 69.72 amu. This is the average of all the isotopes.
Since the average mass of 69.72 is closer to the mass of 69 Ga, this means 69 Ga will be more present than 71 Ga
Percentage 69 Ga> Percentage 71 Ga
<u>Step 2:</u> Calculate the abundance %
⇒Percentage of 71 Ga = X %
⇒Percentage of 69 Ga = 100 % - X %
The mass balance equation will be:
100*69.72 = x * 71 + (100 - x)*69
6972 = 71x + 6900 -69x
72 = 2x
x = 36 %
71 Ga has a naturally abundance of 36%
69 Ga has a naturally abundance of 64%
Explanation:
The given data is as follows.
Weight of solute = 75.8 g, Molecular weight of solute (toulene) = 92.13 g/mol, volume = 200 ml
- Therefore, molarity of toulene is calculated as follows.
Molarity = 
= 
= 4.11 M
Hence, molarity of toulene is 4.11 M.
- As molality is the number of moles of solute present in kg of solvent.
So, we will calculate the molality of toulene as follows.
Molality = 
= 
= 8.6 m
Hence, molality of given toulene solution is 8.6 m.
- Now, calculate the number of moles of toulene as follows.
No. of moles = 
= 
= 0.8227 mol
Now, no. of moles of benzene will be as follows.
No. of moles = 
= 
= 1.2239 mol
Hence, the mole fraction of toulene is as follows.
Mole fraction = 
= 
= 0.402
Hence, mole fraction of toulene is 0.402.
- As density of given solution is 0.857
so, we will calculate the mass of solution as follows.
Density = 
0.857
=
(As 1
= 1 g)
mass = 171.4 g
Therefore, calculate the mass percent of toulene as follows.
Mass % = 
= 
= 44.22%
Therefore, mass percent of toulene is 44.22%.
Answer: They can be separated by physical processes.
Explanation: A mixture is made up of two or more substances that are not chemically combined and can be easily separated into its constituents by physical methods.
Answer:
See attachment.
Explanation:
Mono-substituted cyclohexanes are more stable with their substituents in an equatorial position. However, with poly-substituted cyclohexanes, the situation is more complex since the steric effects of all substituents have to be taken into account. In this case, you can see that <u>the interconversion is shifted towards the conformation in the bottom because there is less tension between the substituents</u>.