1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nitella [24]
2 years ago
14

The mercalli scale is a scale from ________.

Physics
1 answer:
Mashcka [7]2 years ago
6 0
<h2>Answer: 1 to 12. </h2>

<u>The Mercalli seismological scale is a scale of 12 degrees</u>, where 1 is very weak and 12 catastrophic.

This scale owes its name to the Italian physicist Giuseppe Mercalli and was developed to assess the intensity of earthquakes through the effects and damages caused to different structures.

This means the <u>Mercalli scale measures how strong a earthquake has been by </u><u>its consequences and not by its magnitude</u><u>, therefore it is based on </u><u>empirical observations.</u>

You might be interested in
Describe the movement of the man when the resultant horizontal force is ON
vagabundo [1.1K]

Answer:

Explanation:

hope this helps <3

6 0
2 years ago
A 190 g glider on a horizontal, frictionless air track is attached to a fixed ideal spring with force constant 160 N/m. At the i
laiz [17]

(a) Let <em>x</em> be the maximum elongation of the spring. At this point, the glider would have zero velocity and thus zero kinetic energy. The total work <em>W</em> done by the spring on the glider to get it from the given point (4.00 cm from equilibrium) to <em>x</em> is

<em>W</em> = - (1/2 <em>kx</em> ² - 1/2 <em>k</em> (0.0400 m)²)

(note that <em>x</em> > 4.00 cm, and the restoring force of the spring opposes its elongation, so the total work is negative)

By the work-energy theorem, the total work is equal to the change in the glider's kinetic energy as it moves from 4.00 cm from equilibrium to <em>x</em>, so

<em>W</em> = ∆<em>K</em> = 0 - 1/2 <em>m</em> (0.835 m/s)²

Solve for <em>x</em> :

- (1/2 (160 N/m) <em>x</em> ² - 1/2 (160 N/m) (0.0400 m)²) = -1/2 (0.190 kg) (0.835 m/s)²

==>   <em>x</em> ≈ 0.0493 m ≈ 4.93 cm

(b) The glider attains its maximum speed at the equilibrium point. The work done by the spring as it is stretched away from equilibrium to the 4.00 cm position is

<em>W</em> = - 1/2 <em>k</em> (0.0400 m)²

If <em>v</em> is the glider's maximum speed, then by the work-energy theorem,

<em>W</em> = ∆<em>K</em> = 1/2 <em>m</em> (0.835 m/s)² - 1/2 <em>mv</em> ²

Solve for <em>v</em> :

- 1/2 (160 N/m) (0.0400 m)² = 1/2 (0.190 kg) (0.835 m/s)² - 1/2 (0.190 kg) <em>v</em> ²

==>   <em>v</em> ≈ 1.43 m/s

(c) The angular frequency of the glider's oscillation is

√(<em>k</em>/<em>m</em>) = √((160 N/m) / (0.190 kg)) ≈ 29.0 Hz

3 0
2 years ago
Two equal, but oppositely charged particles are attracted to each other electrically. The size of the force of attraction is 48.
galina1969 [7]

Given:

The force of attraction is F = 48.1 N

The separation between the charges is

\begin{gathered} r=\text{ 60.9 cm} \\ =\text{ 60.9}\times10^{-2}\text{ m} \end{gathered}

Also, the magnitude of charge q1 = q2 = q.

To find the magnitude of charge.

Explanation:

The magnitude of charge can be calculated by the formula

\begin{gathered} F=\frac{k(2q)}{r^2} \\ q=\frac{Fr^2}{2k} \end{gathered}

Here, k is the Coulomb's constant whose value is

k\text{ = 9}\times10^9\text{ N m}^2\text{ /C}^2

On substituting the values, the magnitude of charge will be

\begin{gathered} q=\frac{48.1\times(60.9^\times10^{-2})^2}{2\times9\times10^{^9}} \\ =9.91\times10^{-10}\text{ C} \\ =9.91\times10^{-4}\text{ }\mu C \end{gathered}

Thus, the magnitude of each charge is 9.91 x 10^(-4) micro Coulombs.

6 0
1 year ago
The data table depicts an object moving with changing speed.<br><br> True<br> False
Nimfa-mama [501]
The answer is true. The table does show an object moving with changing speed.
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is being social media famous worth real-life relationships?
Maru [420]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

Social media fame isnt worth it, because youre not really able to connect with people. Real life relationships with friends, family, and everything else is way more important. having people notice you or be attracted to you through the internet is nothing compared to real life social interactions. Dont leave people just to be online, youre going to regret it.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • To make extra money during the summer, Mr. Garber, a 66.0-kg physics teacher, paints the outside of houses while sitting on a 5.
    12·1 answer
  • In your opinion, is "avoiding" an effective conflict management strategy? Why or why not?
    15·2 answers
  • WHAT IS A INNATE RESPOSE?/EXAMPLE AND ANSWER
    12·1 answer
  • In the product 6o2 what does the coefficient mean
    11·2 answers
  • A soccer ball is released from rest at the top of a grassy incline. After 4.1 seconds, the ball travels 43 meters and 1.0 s afte
    6·1 answer
  • 7. How many forces are acting on this object? *<br> Fnorm<br> Ffrict<br> Fapp<br> Fgray<br> Å
    6·1 answer
  • How can a wind turbine be used to make an electric circuit?
    10·1 answer
  • I need help with number 2 pls it’s a quiz grade
    5·1 answer
  • An earth satellite travels in a circular orbit at 20,000 mph if the radius of the orbit is 4,300 mi what angular velocity is gen
    14·1 answer
  • A 700-kg car, driving at 29 m/s, hits a brick wall and rebounds with a speed of 4. 5 m/s. What is the car’s change in momentum d
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!