All categories

3 years ago

Help with 1 through 10 plz

Chemistry

1 answer:

Eddi Din [679]3 years ago

4 0

1. composition
2. changes
3. five
4. carbon
5. carbon
6. analytical chemistry
7. physical chemistry
8. living organisms
9. goal
10. knowledge

You might be interested in

What kind of waves do light waves travel in and how do they move

IgorLugansk [536]

Light is one form of energy that travels in electromagnetic waves. This energy is both magnetic and electrical. There are many different types of electromagnetic (EM) waves.

8 0

2 years ago

Does sodium satisfy the ostet rule?

Charra [1.4K]

Answer:

The rule is especially applicable to carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and the halogens, but also to metals such as sodium or magnesium. ... All four of these electrons are counted in both the carbon octet and the oxygen octet, so that both atoms are considered to obey the octet rule.

8 0

3 years ago

The standard free energy of formation, ΔG∘f, of a substance is the free energy change for the formation of one mole of the subst

OLEGan [10]

Answer:

B. 2 Na(s) + O₂(g) → Na₂O₂(s); ΔG∘f=−451.0 kJ/mol

D. 2 SO(g) + O₂(g) → 2 SO₂(g); ΔG°f=−600.4 kJ/mol

Explanation:

The spontaneity of a reaction is given by the value of the standard Gibbs free energy of the reaction (ΔG°rxn). The more negative is the ΔG°rxn, the more spontaneous is a reaction.

The ΔG°rxn can be calculated using the following expression:

ΔG°rxn = ∑np × ΔG°f(products) − ∑nr × ΔG°f(reactants)

By definition, the standard Gibbs free energy of formation of simple substances in their most stable state is zero. That is why, in the reaction of formation of a compound ΔG°rxn = ΔG°f(product).

Based on the standard free energies of formation, which of the following reactions represent a feasible way to synthesize the product?

A. N₂(g) + H₂(g) → N₂H₄(g); ΔG°f=159.3 kJ/mol.

Not feasible. ΔG°rxn = ΔG°f(product) > 0.

B. 2 Na(s) + O₂(g) → Na₂O₂(s); ΔG°f=−451.0 kJ/mol

Feasible. ΔG°rxn = ΔG°f(product) < 0.

C. 2 C(s) + 2 H₂(g) → C₂H₄(g); ΔG°f=68.20 kJ/mol

Not feasible. ΔG°rxn = ΔG°f(product) > 0.

D. 2 SO(g) + O₂(g) → 2 SO₂(g); ΔG°f=−600.4 kJ/mol

Feasible. ΔG°rxn = ΔG°f(product) < 0.

3 0

4 years ago

It is proposed to use Liquid Petroleum Gas (LPG) to fuel spark-ignition engines. A typical sample of the fuel on a volume basis

Norma-Jean [14]

Answer:

The overall balanced combustion reaction is written as :

$0.7C_3H_8 \ + \ 0.05C_4H_{10} \ + \ 0.25 C_3H_6 \ + \ x(O_2 \ + \ 3.76N_2) ---> 3.05CO_2 \ + \ 3.8H_2O \ + \ 18.612N_2$

$(F/A)_{stoichiometric} = 0.0424$

$(A/F)_{stoichiometric} = 23.562$

the higher heating values $(HHV)_f$ per unit mass of LPG = 49.9876 MJ/kg

the lower heating values $(LHV)_f$ per unit mass of LPG = 46.4933 MJ/kg

Explanation:

The stoichiometric equation can be expressed as :

$0.7C_3H_8 \ + \ 0.05C_4H_{10} \ + \ 0.25 C_3H_6 \ + \ x(O_2 \ + \ 3.76N_2) ---> aCO_2 \ + \ bH_2O \ + \ cN_2$

Now, equating the coefficient of carbon; we have:

(0.7×3)+(0.05×4)+(0.25×3) = a

a = 3.05

Also, Equating the coefficient of hydrogen : we have:

(0.7 × 8) +(0.05 × 10) + ( 0.25 × 6) = 2 b

2b = 7.6

b = 3.8

Equating the coefficient of oxygen

2x = 2a + b

$x = \frac{2a+b}{2} \\ \\ x = \frac{2(3.05)+3.8}{2} \\ \\ x = 4.95$

Equating the coefficient of Nitrogen

$c = 3.76x \\ \\ c = 3.76 *4.95 \\ \\ c = 18.612$

Therefore, The overall balanced combustion reaction can now be written as :

$0.7C_3H_8 \ + \ 0.05C_4H_{10} \ + \ 0.25 C_3H_6 \ + \ x(O_2 \ + \ 3.76N_2) ---> 3.05CO_2 \ + \ 3.8H_2O \ + \ 18.612N_2$

Now; To determine the stoichiometric F/A and A/F ratios; we have:

$(F/A)_{stoichiometric} = \frac{n_f}{n_a } \\ \\ (F/A)_{stoichiometric} = \frac{1}{4.95*(1+3.76)} \\ \\ (F/A)_{stoichiometric} = 0.0424$

$(A/F)_{stoichiometric} = \frac{n_a}{n_f } \\ \\ (A/F)_{stoichiometric} = \frac{4.95*(1+3.76)}{1} \\ \\ (A/F)_{stoichiometric} = 23.562$

What are the higher and lower heating values per unit mass of LPG?

Let calculate the molecular mass of the fuel in order to determine their mass fraction of the fuel components.

Molecular mass of the fuel $M_f = (0.7*M_{C_3H_5} ) + (0.05 *M_{C_4H_{10}}) + (0.25*M _{C_3H_6})$

= 30.8 + 2.9 + 10.5

= 44.2 kg/mol

Mass fraction of the fuel components can now be calculated as :

$m_{C_3H_8} = \frac{30.8}{44.2} \\ \\ m_{C_3H_8} = 0.7 \\ \\ \\ m_{C_4H_{10}} = \frac[2.9}{44.2} \\ \\ m_{C_4H_{10}} = 0.06 \\ \\ \\ m_{C_3H_6} = \frac{10.5}{44.2} \\ \\ m_{C_3H_6} = 0.24$

Finally; calculating the higher heating values $(HHV)_f$ per unit mass of LPG; we have:

$(HHV)_f=(0.7 * HHV_{C_3H_8}) + (0.06 *HHV_{C_4H_{10}})+(0.24*HHV_{C_3H_6} \\ \\ (HHV)_f=(0.7*50.38)+(0.06*49.56)+(0.24*48.95) \\ \\ (HHV)_f=49.9876 \ MJ/kg$

calculating the lower heating values $(LHV)_f$ per unit mass of LPG; we have:

$(LHV)_f = (HHV)_f - \delta H_w \\ \\ (LHV)_f = (HHV)_f - [\frac{m_w}{m_f}h_{vap}] \\ \\ (LHV)_f = 49.9876 \ MJ/kg - [\frac{3.8*18}{44.2}*2.258 \ MJ/kg] \\ \\ (LHV)_f = 46.4933 \ M/kg$

7 0

4 years ago

Why didn't you just clean the spill with water?

Allisa [31]

Answer:

if you did it would probably make it bigger...

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago