Answer:
CO2 emissions from fossil fuel burning should be minimized at all cost. The CO2 are gotten when the carbons from hydrocarbons react with air(oxygen). This gas erodes the ozone layer which makes the melting of ice caps faster due to increased amount of heat radiations on the earth. This is the only best and permanent solution to the reduction of the amount of heat rays on the earth which is a global problem.
Objects which reflects back the sunrays could also be inserted into the sea to prevent the melting of the ice caps.
Option (ii) B is the correct option. The object on the moon has greater mass.
To resolve this, utilize the formulas Force = Mass * Acceleration.
The equation can be used to find the mass given the force in Newtons, using 9.8 m/s² for the acceleration of gravity of the earth and 1.6 m/s² for the moon.
Calculating the mass on earth:
30 N = 9.8 m/s² * mass
This results in a mass of 3.0 kg for the object on Earth.
Calculating the mass of the moon:
30 N = 1.6 m/s²2 * mass
Thus, the moon's object has a mass of 19. kg.
This can be explained by the fact that the earth has a stronger gravitational pull than the moon, producing more force per kilogram of mass. As a result, the moon's mass must be bigger to produce the same amount of force at a lower acceleration from gravity (1.6 m/s² vs. 9.8 m/s²).
To know more about Mass, refer to this link :
brainly.com/question/13386792
#SPJ9
Water is, indeed, an exception. Normally when temperature drops, material shrinks. Water doesn't, water expands instead.
Answer: hope it helps you...❤❤❤❤
Explanation: If your values have dimensions like time, length, temperature, etc, then if the dimensions are not the same then the values are not the same. So a “dimensionally wrong equation” is always false and cannot represent a correct physical relation.
No, not necessarily.
For instance, Newton’s 2nd law is F=p˙ , or the sum of the applied forces on a body is equal to its time rate of change of its momentum. This is dimensionally correct, and a correct physical relation. It’s fine.
But take a look at this (incorrect) equation for the force of gravity:
F=−G(m+M)Mm√|r|3r
It has all the nice properties you’d expect: It’s dimensionally correct (assuming the standard traditional value for G ), it’s attractive, it’s symmetric in the masses, it’s inverse-square, etc. But it doesn’t correspond to a real, physical force.
It’s a counter-example to the claim that a dimensionally correct equation is necessarily a correct physical relation.
A simpler counter example is 1=2 . It is stating the equality of two dimensionless numbers. It is trivially dimensionally correct. But it is false.
Answer:
2.5kN.m
Explanation:
Torque is directly proportional to pitch diameter
= Ta/Tb= Da/Db
=120/Tb= 0.25/0.5
Tb= 2.469kN.m approx 2.5kN.m
