They look like tiny cubes. They are in a cubic form.
It would make both half 4cm to 2cm wide, and 6cm to 3cm long, 10cm to 5cm hight it would split in half
Sounds like the situation is modeled like so:
[Light] - - - - - - - - - - [You] => - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Cop] - - - - -
<= = = 200 m = = =>
where your velocity is 27.8 m/s to the right. So the question is asking, is it possible that your car, given that it accelerates at a maximum of 1/5 m/s^2, can reach a speed of 27.8 m/s from rest in the time it takes for it to cover 200 m.
The car's position at time
is

The time it takes to traverse 200 m is

Your car's velocity at time
, starting from rest, is

so that after 16.3 s, your car is moving at a speed of

which is less than the speed the cop claims you were going, so the cop is not correct.
An incandescent bulb produces light that comes from the heating of a filament. A compact fluorescent bulb produces light when a substance is hit by electromagnetic radiation. Compact fluorescent bulbs are more efficient than incandescent bulbs.
The first law of thermodynamics is a version of the law of conservation of energy, adapted for thermodynamic processes. Therefore, a system with lower heat emissions would be more efficient.
The second law of thermodynamics states that the total entropy of an isolated system (the thermal energy per unit temperature that is unavailable for doing useful work) can never decrease. In our context, it means that the system with the least amount of losses would be more efficient. As a conclusion the fluorescent bulb would be more efficient.