Answer:
Bonds basically differs with each other due to sharing of electrons .
Explanation:
There are majorly three kinds of bonds
1. Ionic bonds which forms due to an element donate an electron to another element completely .
2. covalent bonds which forms with the mutual sharing of electrons b/w two atoms .
3. metallic bonds which forms b/w metals & they share electrons due to electron negativity difference b/w two atoms or elements
Original molarity was 1.7 moles of NaCl
Final molarity was 0.36 moles of NaCl
Given Information:
Original (concentrated) solution: 25 g NaCl in a 250 mL solution, solve for molarity
Final (diluted) solution: More water is added to make the new total volume 1.2 liters, solve for the new molarity
1. Solve for the molarity of the original (concentrated) solution.
Molarity (M) = moles of solute (mol) / liters of solution (L)
Convert the given information to the appropriate units before plugging in and solving for molarity.
Molarity (M) = 0.43 mol NaCl solute / 0.250 L solution = 1.7 M NaCl (original solution)
2. Solve for the molarity of the final (diluted) solution.
Remember that the amount of solute remains constant in a dilution problem; it is just the total volume of the solution that changes due to the addition of solvent.
Molarity (M) = 0.43 mol NaCl solute / 1.2 L solution
Molarity (M) of the final solution = 0.36 M NaCl
I hope this helped:))
<span>This would be the activation energy. This is usually in the form of heat, which allows the reaction to undergo some sort of transition. Many times, enzymes can be used as catalysts to lower the activation energy required for the reaction to take place.</span>
Websites that end in .com or .org should be avoided.
Answer:
Fe is limiting, and it will produce .0188 mols of Fe2O3
Explanation:
after you convert both Fe and O2 to mols by using their molar mass, you see there is less Fe than O2 so that is your limiting reactant. To find the amount of Fe2O3 you devide the limiting reactant by it's coefeciant (4) then multiply it by the products coefficant (2). Let me know if you have any questions
