1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
emmainna [20.7K]
3 years ago
11

Amir and Gracie left some evidence of breakfast behind. Luckily, some of it can be changed back. What does Mosa write down as cl

ues that a substance will easily change back?
Physics
1 answer:
marta [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

You could say that it was not a chemicly change because that is when you say this is just a example that if you cook eggs you cant un-cook them

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Can you please help me it’s due at 11:59 please
antoniya [11.8K]

Answer:

1 is summer, 2 is most likely winter,3 is most likely summer, and 4 is fall

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Helppppppp its exam ​
UkoKoshka [18]

Answer:

a. 240.2 C

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
A projectile of mass m is launched with an initial velocity vector v i making an angle θ with the horizontal as shown below. The
sergeinik [125]
Angular momentum is given by the length of the arm to the object, multiplied by the momentum of the object, times the cosine of the angle that the momentum vector makes with the arm. From your illustration, that will be: 
<span>L = R * m * vi * cos(90 - theta) </span>

<span>cos(90 - theta) is just sin(theta) </span>
<span>and R is the distance the projectile traveled, which is vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / g </span>

<span>so, we have: L = vi^2 * sin(2*theta) * m * vi * sin(theta) / g </span>

<span>We can combine the two vi terms and get: </span>

<span>L = vi^3 * m * sin(theta) * sin(2*theta) / g </span>

<span>What's interesting is that angular momentum varies with the *cube* of the initial velocity. This is because, not only does increased velocity increase the translational momentum of the projectile, but it increase the *moment arm*, too. Also note that there might be a trig identity which lets you combine the two sin() terms, but nothing jumps out at me right at the moment. </span>

<span>Now, for the first part... </span>

<span>There are a few ways to attack this. Basically, you have to find the angle from the origin to the apogee (highest point) in the arc. Once we have that, we'll know what angle the momentum vector makes with the moment-arm because, at the apogee, we know that all of the motion is *horizontal*. </span>

<span>Okay, so let's get back to what we know: </span>

<span>L = d * m * v * cos(phi) </span>

<span>where d is the distance (length to the arm), m is mass, v is velocity, and phi is the angle the velocity vector makes with the arm. Let's take these one by one... </span>

<span>m is still m. </span>
<span>v is going to be the *hoizontal* component of the initial velocity (all the vertical component got eliminated by the acceleration of gravity). So, v = vi * cos(theta) </span>
<span>d is going to be half of our distance R in part two (because, ignoring friction, the path of the projectile is a perfect parabola). So, d = vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / 2g </span>

<span>That leaves us with phi, the angle the horizontal velocity vector makes with the moment arm. To find *that*, we need to know what the angle from the origin to the apogee is. We can find *that* by taking the arc-tangent of the slope, if we know that. Well, we know the "run" part of the slope (it's our "d" term), but not the rise. </span>

<span>The easy way to get the rise is by using conservation of energy. At the apogee, all of the *vertical* kinetic energy at the time of launch (1/2 * m * (vi * sin(theta))^2 ) has been turned into gravitational potential energy ( m * g * h ). Setting these equal, diving out the "m" and dividing "g" to the other side, we get: </span>

<span>h = 1/2 * (vi * sin(theta))^2 / g </span>

<span>So, there's the rise. So, our *slope* is rise/run, so </span>

<span>slope = [ 1/2 * (vi * sin(theta))^2 / g ] / [ vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / g ] </span>

<span>The "g"s cancel. Astoundingly the "vi"s cancel, too. So, we get: </span>

<span>slope = [ 1/2 * sin(theta)^2 ] / [ sin(2*theta) ] </span>

<span>(It's not too alarming that slope-at-apogee doesn't depend upon vi, since that only determines the "magnitude" of the arc, but not it's shape. Whether the overall flight of this thing is an inch or a mile, the arc "looks" the same). </span>

<span>Okay, so... using our double-angle trig identities, we know that sin(2*theta) = 2*sin(theta)*cos(theta), so... </span>

<span>slope = [ 1/2 * sin(theta)^2 ] / [ 2*sin(theta)*cos(theta) ] = tan(theta)/4 </span>

<span>Okay, so the *angle* (which I'll call "alpha") that this slope makes with the x-axis is just: arctan(slope), so... </span>

<span>alpha = arctan( tan(theta) / 4 ) </span>

<span>Alright... last bit. We need "phi", the angle the (now-horizontal) momentum vector makes with that slope. Draw it on paper and you'll see that phi = 180 - alpha </span>

<span>so, phi = 180 - arctan( tan(theta) / 4 ) </span>

<span>Now, we go back to our original formula and plug it ALL in... </span>

<span>L = d * m * v * cos(phi) </span>

<span>becomes... </span>

<span>L = [ vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / 2g ] * m * [ vi * cos(theta) ] * [ cos( 180 - arctan( tan(theta) / 4 ) ) ] </span>

<span>Now, cos(180 - something) = cos(something), so we can simplify a little bit... </span>

<span>L = [ vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / 2g ] * m * [ vi * cos(theta) ] * [ cos( arctan( tan(theta) / 4 ) ) ] </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The repulsive force between two protons has a magnitude of 2.00 N. What is the distance between them?
Aloiza [94]

Answer:

The answer to your question is letter A.     r = 1.07 x 10⁻¹⁴ m

Explanation:

Data

F = 2 N

d = ?

q = 1.6 x 10 ⁻¹⁹ C

k = 8.987 Nm²/C²

Formula

                 F = K\frac{q1q2}{r^{2}}

Solve for r

                r = \sqrt{\frac{kq1q2}{F}}

Substitution

                r = \sqrt{\frac{8.987 x 10^{9}x1.6 x 10^{-19} x 1.6 x 10x^{-19}}{2}}

Simplification

                r = \sqrt{\frac{2.3 x 10^{-28}}{2}}

                r = \sqrt{1.15 x 10^{-24}}

Result

                r = 1.07 x 10⁻¹⁴ m

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help Plaeseeeeeeee!
vladimir2022 [97]

Answer:

golf all on grass covered hill in sunlight

Explanation:

someone pouring/spinning top has a lot of motion going on. a roller coaster has force acting on it which increases the motion.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A child rides her bike at a rate of 12.0 km/hr down the street. A squirrel suddenly runs in front of her so she applies the brak
    10·1 answer
  • Magnetic Field from a Current Element An electron is moving through a uniform electric field, ????????0, parallel to an infinite
    9·1 answer
  • which of the following atomic models depicts electrons moving in waves, forming a cloud around the nucleus of an atom
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the falling animals filter feeds?
    12·2 answers
  • A cyclist rides 4.0 km due west, then 12.0 km 33° west of north. From this point she rides 9.0 km due east. What is the final di
    12·1 answer
  • What is the definition of power​
    11·1 answer
  • Two beams of coherent light start out at the same point in phase and travel different paths to arrive at point P. If the maximum
    12·1 answer
  • On the periodic table , the vertical columns that extend down the periodic table are called ?
    14·1 answer
  • Godric and Savos are a few meters apart, at one end of the football field. Peter is at the other end of the field. Godric and Sa
    8·1 answer
  • If the x and y vector components of Vector A are 11 and 7,
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!