The top pair of pliers failed to loosen a stubborn bolt, but the bottom pair successfully removed it. Because the contact between the bolt and the pliers working surface is less.
<h3>What is mechanical advantage ?</h3>
Mechanical advantage is a measure of the ratio of output force to input force in a system, it is used to obtained efficiency of the given mechanical machine.
The efficiency to open the stubborn bolt depends upon the contact between the working surface of the pliers and the bolt.
The contact between the bolt and the top pair of pliers working surface is less. Its mechanical advantage is less.
Hence, the top pair of pliers failed to loosen a stubborn bolt, but the bottom pair successfully removed it.
To learn more about the mechanical advantage, refer to the link;
brainly.com/question/7638820
#SPJ1
The magnetic field strength in a coil is directly proportional to the number of turns, or loops, in the coil.
Therefore, when there are four loops instead of one, the magnetic field strength has increased four times, making it harder to push the magnet in.
Answer:
The electric field at x = 3L is 166.67 N/C
Solution:
As per the question:
The uniform line charge density on the x-axis for x, 0< x< L is 
Total charge, Q = 7 nC = 
At x = 2L,
Electric field, 
Coulomb constant, K = 
Now, we know that:

Also the line charge density:

Thus
Q = 
Now, for small element:


Integrating both the sides from x = L to x = 2L

![\vec{E_{2L}} = K\lambda[\frac{- 1}{x}]_{L}^{2L}] = K\frac{Q}{L}[frac{1}{2L}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cvec%7BE_%7B2L%7D%7D%20%3D%20K%5Clambda%5B%5Cfrac%7B-%201%7D%7Bx%7D%5D_%7BL%7D%5E%7B2L%7D%5D%20%3D%20K%5Cfrac%7BQ%7D%7BL%7D%5Bfrac%7B1%7D%7B2L%7D%5D)
![\vec{E_{2L}} = (9\times 10^{9})\frac{7\times 10^{- 9}}{L}[frac{1}{2L}] = \frac{63}{L^{2}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cvec%7BE_%7B2L%7D%7D%20%3D%20%289%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B9%7D%29%5Cfrac%7B7%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-%209%7D%7D%7BL%7D%5Bfrac%7B1%7D%7B2L%7D%5D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B63%7D%7BL%5E%7B2%7D%7D)
Similarly,
For the field in between the range 2L< x < 3L:

![\vec{E} = K\lambda[\frac{- 1}{x}]_{2L}^{3L}] = K\frac{Q}{L}[frac{1}{6L}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cvec%7BE%7D%20%3D%20K%5Clambda%5B%5Cfrac%7B-%201%7D%7Bx%7D%5D_%7B2L%7D%5E%7B3L%7D%5D%20%3D%20K%5Cfrac%7BQ%7D%7BL%7D%5Bfrac%7B1%7D%7B6L%7D%5D)
![\vec{E} = (9\times 10^{9})\frac{7\times 10^{- 9}}{L}[frac{1}{6L}] = \frac{63}{6L^{2}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cvec%7BE%7D%20%3D%20%289%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B9%7D%29%5Cfrac%7B7%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-%209%7D%7D%7BL%7D%5Bfrac%7B1%7D%7B6L%7D%5D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B63%7D%7B6L%5E%7B2%7D%7D)
Now,
If at x = 2L,

Then at x = 3L:

Answer:
I=1,2•10³ kg•m/s
Explanation:
v¹=3.5m/s
vf=5m/s
v=5-3.5=1.5m/s
I=p
I=mv=850•1.5=1275 kg•m/s=1,2•10³ kg•m/s