The mechanical energy of an object is a combination of its potential energy and its <em><u>kinetic</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>energy</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
Answer:
insert (array[] , value , currentsize , maxsize )
{
if maxsize <=currentsize
{
return -1
}
index = currentsize-1
while (i>=0 && array[index] > value)
{
array[index+1]=array[index]
i=i-1
}
array[i+1]=value
return 0
}
Explanation:
1: Check if array is already full, if it's full then no component may be inserted.
2: if array isn't full:
- Check parts of the array ranging from last position of range towards initial range and determine position of that initial range that is smaller than the worth to be inserted.
- Right shift every component of the array once ranging from last position up to the position larger than the position at that smaller range was known.
- assign new worth to the position that is next to the known position of initial smaller component.
Answer:
X_cp = c/2
Explanation:
We are given;
Chord = c
Angle of attack = α
p u (s) = c 1
p1(s)=c2,
and c2 > c1
First of all, we need to find the resultant normal force on the plate and the total moment about leading edge.
I've attached the solution
Answer:
a) The key issues are the sue for libel and the evidence.
b) I would make a deal with her and implement a security program in the company.
Explanation:
The main issue in this case is that Pam Jones sued the company for libel, and the company remains in a position in which it has to prove that the internal investigation followed the right steps and indeed, the proves reflected that she was guilty and the fact that she got fired was correct.
The important here is exactly that the theft can be proved.
As an HR Director, I would give the correct proves in order to win the case, and if that is impossible, because of the tools and evidence, I would make a deal with her where both parts can be adequate to the problem.
She can´t be working again in the company but she can get financed according to her working years; also I would use this case as a growing opportunity by implementing new security methods that give more confidence between the company and its employees.
Explanation:
As a general rule of thumb, the large the diameter of a bearing, bushing or pin, the larger the tolerance range,” Brieschke points out. “The inverse is true for smaller-diameter pieces.”
Mike Brieschke, vice president of sales at Aries Engineering, says a 0.25-inch-diameter metal dowel that is press-fit into a mild steel hole usually has an interference of ±0.0015 inch. Parts in noncritical assemblies tend to have looser tolerances
please rate brainliest if helps and follow
