A <u>centrifugal switch</u> is used commonly in open split-phase motors to disconnect the start winding from the electrical circuit when the motor reaches approximately 75% of its rated speed.
Hope that helps!
Answer:
hello your question is incomplete attached below is the complete question
A) optimum compressor ratio = 9.144
B) specific thrust = 2.155 N.s /kg
C) Thrust specific fuel consumption = 1670.4 kg/N.h
Explanation:
Given data :
Mo = 2.1 , To = 220k , Tt4 = 1700 k, hpr = 42000 kj/kg, Cp = 1.004 kj/ kg.k
γ = 1.4
attached below is the detailed solution
Answer:
If the heat engine operates for one hour:
a) the fuel cost at Carnot efficiency for fuel 1 is $409.09 while fuel 2 is $421.88.
b) the fuel cost at 40% of Carnot efficiency for fuel 1 is $1022.73 while fuel 2 is $1054.68.
In both cases the total cost of using fuel 1 is minor, therefore it is recommended to use this fuel over fuel 2. The final observation is that fuel 1 is cheaper.
Explanation:
The Carnot efficiency is obtained as:

Where
is the atmospheric temperature and
is the maximum burn temperature.
For the case (B), the efficiency we will use is:

The work done by the engine can be calculated as:
where Hv is the heat value.
If the average net power of the engine is work over time, considering a net power of 2.5MW for 1 hour (3600s), we can calculate the mass of fuel used in each case.

If we want to calculate the total fuel cost, we only have to multiply the fuel mass with the cost per kilogram.

Answer:
The new length of the rod is 182 cm.
Explanation:
Given that a rod that was originally 100-cm-long experiences a strain of 82%, to determine what is the new length of the rod, the following calculation must be performed:
100 x 1.82 = X
182 = X
Therefore, the new length of the rod is 182 cm.
Answer:
the third statement is true
Explanation:
given data
Lenovos cost more than Dells
Lenovos cost less than Apples
solution
we have given 1st statement that is express as
cost (Lenovo) > cost (Dell) ..................1
and
2nd statement that is express as
cost (Lenovo) < cost (Apple)
so we can say it as
cost (Apple) > cost (Lenovo) ......................2
and
now above Both equation 1 and 2 can be written as
cost (Apple) > cost (Lenovo) > cost (Dell) .........................3
so we can say cost of Apples is more than the cost of Lenovos and the cost of Dells
so as that given 3rd statement is true