All categories

3 years ago

Please answer, please answer please answer please answermy last 2 chemistry question.

Chemistry

1 answer:

scoundrel [369]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

1. filtration and evaporation

2. i) water is added to the sand and salt mixture

ii) then the mixture is filtrated and so the sand and the salt water was seperated

iii) the salt water is heated with the help of burner until the water gets evaporated

iv) after the water gets evaporated, the salt is remained in the container

3. observation:

on adding water to the mixture, the salt is completely dissolved in the water
when filtrated the sand is seperated from the salt water
now the salt water when heated with the burner until the evaporation, the water is evaporated
the salt is precipitated and remained in the container

4. cautions:

while using the burner, we should be cautious with fire
the container that is heated should be holded with the help of a cloth to avoid heat

You might be interested in

Shown below is a table with plants and animals with their adaptations.

zhenek [66]

Answer:

Desert

Explanation:

The adaptation shown by the given plants and animals shows that they will adapted to the desert biome.

It is so because, due to high temperature of desert some desert animals like camel have the storage of fat in humps or tails; some animals have large ears such as Jackrabbits, it helps to release body heat and adapt in high temperature; plants have thick water holding tissues to reduce water loss in heat and waxy coating that keeps the plants cooler and reduce moisture loss.

Hence, the correct answer is "Desert".

8 0

3 years ago

Which compounds are lewis acids? select all that apply. (ch3ch2)2hc+ cl3c− ch3nh2 bbr3?

alexandr402 [8]

The Lewis acids are electron pair acceptors due to the availability of vacant orbitals they accept electrons from the donor compounds.

$(CH_3CH_2)_2CH^{+}$ is a Lewis acid due to the unfilled valence shell on carbon atom (possessing positive charge) it accepts electron readily.
$CCl_{3}^{-}$ is not a Lewis acid due to the presence of negative charge which represents that there are electrons available for donation.
$CH_3NH_2$ is not a Lewis acid due to the presence of lone pair on nitrogen which is easily donated to the acceptors.
$BBr_3$ is a Lewis acid due to the availability of vacant p-orbital on boron atom.

Hence, $(CH_3CH_2)_2CH^{+}$ and $BBr_3$ are Lewis acids.

3 0

3 years ago

BEST GETS BRAINLIEST!!

tatuchka [14]

Gee. I'll have to guess at what's "commonly thought".

One thing is the scale. Nobody has an accurate picture of the scale in
his head, because we never see a true-scale drawing. THAT's because
it's almost impossible to draw one on paper.

Example:
Shrink the solar system and everything in it so that the Sun
is the size of a quarter (the 25¢ coin).
Then:
-- The Earth is in orbit around the sun, 8.6 feet from it.
That's close enough that you might think you could find the
shrunken Earth. Unfortunately, it's only 0.009 inch in diameter.

-- The shrunken Jupiter is a 'huge' gas giant almost 0.1 inch in diameter.
It's orbiting the sun, about 45 feet away from it.

-- The shrunken Uranus is another gas giant, about 0.035 inch in diameter.
It's orbiting the sun, about 165 feet away from it.

-- The nearest star outside of the solar system is 441 MILES away !
On the same shrunken scale !
And there's NOTHING between here and there !

I think that's the biggest point to make about the REAL solar system ...
its utter emptiness. With the sun reduced to something you can hold
in your hand, the planets are the size of grains of sand, with hundreds
of feet of nothingness between them.

Same for its mass: The solar system is approximately nothing but a star.
That's it. A star, with some dust and some gas around it, and here and there
in the neighborhood a microscopic pebble or a chip of mineral. But mostly
it's nothing but a star ... if you went around and gathered up all that other
rubbish in the same bag and called it a part of the same solar system, the
sun would still have more than 99% of the total mass, and the bag would
hold less than 1% of it.

Book ... It's getting late, Hillary's fading, and that's all I can think of.
I hope this much is some help.

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following CANNOT be determined by looking at the spectra of a star? *

Rzqust [24]

Answer:

A:temperature

Explanation:

The temperature cannot be determined by looking at the spectra of the star due to lack of the equipment for its measurement. <em>On the other-hand, the remaining statements like the distance from earth, movement towards or away from earth can be determined.</em>

8 0

3 years ago

4. The reaction of silver nitrate and potassium bromide yields silver bromide and potassium nitrate. If

Hatshy [7]

Answer:

1.) AgNO₃

2.) 0.563 moles AgBr

Explanation:

The limiting reagent is the reagent that is used up completely during a reaction. It can be identified by calculating which reactant produces the smallest amount of product. This can be done by determining the number of moles of each reagent (via molarity conversion). and then converting it to moles of the product (via mole-to-mole ratio).

AgNO₃ (aq) + KBr (aq) ---> AgBr (s) + KNO₃ (aq)

Molarity (M) = moles / liters

100 mL = 1 L

AgNO₃

45.0 mL / 100 = 45.0 L

1.25 M = ? moles / 0.450 L

? moles = 0.563 moles

KBr

75.0 mL / 100 = 0.750 L

0.800 M = ? moles / 0.750 L

? moles = 0.600 moles

In this case, there is no need to use the mole-to-mole ratio because all of the coefficients are one in the reaction (the amount of the limiting reagent used is the same amount of product produced). Since AgNO₃ produces the smaller amount of product, it is the limiting reagent.

4 0

2 years ago

Please answer, please answer please answer please answermy last 2 chemistry question. ​

Please answer, please answer please answer please answermy last 2 chemistry question.