The shells further away from the nucleus are larger/smaller and can hold more/less electrons.

Chemistry

1 answer:

Sergeu [11.5K]3 years ago

8 0

The shells further away from the nucleus are LARGER and can hold MORE electrons

You might be interested in

you need 16.66ml (+-0.01) of 53.4 (+-0.4)wt% of NaOH with a density of 1.52 (+-0.01)g/mL to prepare 2.00L of 0.169M of NaOH. Wha

pashok25 [27]

Answer:

The absolute uncertainty is approximately 1.69 × 10⁻³

Explanation:

The volume needed for NaOH needed to make the solution = 16.66 ml

The wt% of the added NaOH = 53.4 wt%

The volume of the NaOH to be prepared = 2.00 L

The concentration of the NaOH to be prepared = 0.169 M

The molar mass of NaOH = 39.997 g/mol

Therefore, 100 g of sample contains 53.4 g of NaOH

The mass of the sample = 16.66 × 1.52 = 25.3232 g

The mass of NaOH in the sample = 0.534 × 25.3232 = 13.5225888 g ≈ 13.52 g

Therefore;

The number of moles of NaOH = 13.52/39.9971 = 0.3381 moles

Therefore, we have 0.3381 moles in 2.00L solution, which gives;

The number of moles per liter = 0.3881/2 = 0.169045 moles/liter

The molarity ≈ 0.169 M

The absolute uncertainty, u(c) is given as follows;

$u(c) = \sqrt{ \left (\dfrac{0.01}{16.66} \right )^2 + \left ( \dfrac{0.4}{53.4} \right )^2 + \left ( \dfrac{0.01}{1.52} \right )^2 } \times 0.169 \approx 1.69 \times 10^{-3}$

The absolute uncertainty, u(c) ≈ 1.69 × 10⁻³.

3 0

3 years ago

Does his model correctly show why the properties of the ending substances are different from the properties of the starting subs

topjm [15]

Answer:

Samira's model is incorrect because not all atoms are accounted for

Explanation:

The image of Samira's model has been attached to this answer to enhance the explanation.

What is depicted in that model is rightly regarded as a chemical change. In a chemical change atoms of substances are rearranged as new substances are formed.

However, all atoms in the products must also be found in at least one of the reactants. In this case we have an atom in one of the products that is not accounted for. Hence the model is incorrect.