All categories

2 years ago

How does the amplitude of the wave change as you get farther from the speaker?

Physics

1 answer:

KatRina [158]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The amplitude decreases

Explanation:

From the inverse square law, we know that;

I ∝ 1/d²

Where;

I is intensity

d is distance

Also, we know that;

A² ∝ I

Where A is amplitude

Thus, we can say that;

A ∝ 1/d²

Thus, amplitude is inversely proportional to the distance.

So the larger the distance, the lesser the amplitude and the lesser the distance, the higher the amplitude.

Thus, as you move farther from the speaker the distance increases and therefore the amplitude decreases

You might be interested in

How does Newtons first law of motion relate to planetary motion

Varvara68 [4.7K]

Newton's Laws. Kepler's Laws are wonderful as a description of the motions of the planets. However, they provide no explanation of why the planets move in this way. Moreover, Kepler's Third Law only works for planets around the Sun and does not apply to the Moon's orbit around the Earth or the moons of Jupiter.

!!hope this helpful to you!!
please mark this a !!brainliest answer!!

3 0

3 years ago

Using Excel, or some other graphing software, plot the values of y as a function of x. (You will not submit this spreadsheet. Ho

Evgesh-ka [11]

Answer:

a) > x<-c(1,2,3,4,5)

> y<-c(1.9,3.5,3.7,5.1,6)

> linearmodel<-lm(y~x)

And the output is given by:

> linearmodel

Call:

lm(formula = y ~ x)

Coefficients:

(Intercept) x

1.10 0.98

b) $y = 0.98 x +1.10$

And if we compare this with the general model $y = mx +b$

We see that the slope is m= 0.98 and the intercept b = 1.10

Explanation:

Part a

For this case we have the following data:

x: 1,2,3,4,5

y: 1.9,3.5,3.7,5.1, 6

For this case we can use the following R code:

> x<-c(1,2,3,4,5)

> y<-c(1.9,3.5,3.7,5.1,6)

> linearmodel<-lm(y~x)

And the output is given by:

> linearmodel

Call:

lm(formula = y ~ x)

Coefficients:

(Intercept) x

1.10 0.98

Part b

For this case we have the following trend equation given:

$y = 0.98 x +1.10$

And if we compare this with the general model $y = mx +b$

We see that the slope is m= 0.98 and the intercept b = 1.10

7 0

3 years ago

Steam flows steadily through an adiabatic turbine. The inlet conditions of the steam are 4 MPa, 500◦C, and 80 m/s, and the exit

Cerrena [4.2K]

Answer:

a) ΔEC=-23.4kW

b)W=12106.2kW

c) $A=0.01297m^2$

Explanation:

The kinetic energy is defined as:

$\frac{m*vel^2}{2}$ (vel is the velocity, to differentiate with v, specific volume).

The kinetic energy change will be: Δ ( $\frac{mvel^2}{2}$ )= $\frac{m*vel_2^2}{2}-\frac{m*vel_1^2}{2}$

Δ ( $\frac{mvel^2}{2}$ )= $\frac{m}{2}*(vel_2^2-vel_1^2)$

Where 1 and 2 subscripts mean initial and final state respectively.

Δ( $\frac{mvel^2}{2}$ )= $\frac{12\frac{kg}{s}}{2}*(50^2-80^2)\frac{m^2}{s^2}=-23400W=-23.4kW$

This amount is negative because the steam is losing that energy.

Consider the energy balance, with a neglective height difference: The energy that enters to the turbine (which is in the steam) is the same that goes out (which is in the steam and in the work done).

$H_1+\frac{m*vel_1^2}{2}=H_2+\frac{m*vel_2^2}{2}+W\\W=m*(h_1-h_2)+\frac{m}{2} *(vel_1^2-vel_2^2)$

We already know the last quantity: $\frac{m}{2} *(vel_1^2-vel_2^2)$ = $-$ Δ ( $\frac{mvel^2}{2}$ )=23400W

For the steam enthalpies, review the steam tables (I attach the ones that I used); according to that, $h_1=h(T=500C,P=4MPa)=3445.3\frac{kJ}{kg}$

The exit state is a liquid-vapor mixture, so its enthalpy is:

$h_2=h_f+xh_{fg}=289.23+0.92*2366.1=2483.4\frac{kJ}{kg}$

Finally, the work can be obtained:

$W=12\frac{kg}{s}*(3445.3-2438.4)\frac{kJ}{kg} +23.400kW)=12106.2kW$

C) For the area, consider the equation of mass flow:

$m=p*vel*A$ where $p$ is the density, and A the area. The density is the inverse of the specific volume, so $m=\frac{vel*A}{v}$

The specific volume of the inlet steam can be read also from the steam tables, and its value is: $0.08643\frac{m^3}{kg}$ , so:

$A=\frac{m*v}{vel}=\frac{12\frac{kg}{s}*0.08643\frac{m^3}{kg}}{80\frac{m}{s}}=0.01297m^2$

Download pdf

7 0

3 years ago

A 10-ft ladder is leaning against a wall. If the top of the ladder slides down the wall at a rate of 2 ft/sec, how fast is the b

netineya [11]

Answer: The bottom of the ladder is moving at 3.464ft/sec

Explanation:

The question defines a right angle triangle. Therefore using pythagorean

h^2 + l^2 = 10^2 = 100 ...eq1

dh/dt = -2ft/sec

dl/ dt = ?

Taking derivatives of time in eq 1 on both sides

2hdh/dt + 2ldl/dt = 0 ....eq2

Putting l = 5ft in eq2

h^ + 5^2 = 100

h^2 = 25 = 100

h Sqrt(75)

h = 8.66 ft

Put h = 8.66ft in eq2

2 × 8.66 × (-2) + 2 ×5 dl/dt

dl/dt = 17.32 / 5

dl/dt = 3.464ft/sec

7 0

3 years ago

Questlon 20 of 20 Which change to an object would quadruple its kinetic energy?

worty [1.4K]

Answer:Questlon 20 of 20 Which change to an object would quadruple its kinetic energy?

A. Reducing its mass to one-half of its original value