All categories

3 years ago

How do you upgrade a computer

Engineering

2 answers:

PilotLPTM [1.2K]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

get a

Explanation:

get an sd card your welcome

makvit [3.9K]3 years ago

8 0

You can buy a new one ;)

You might be interested in

Read the passage.

Archy [21]

The claim being made in in the above passage is that " It makes financial sense to stop using the penny." (Option B)

<h3>What textual evidence backs up the above claim?</h3>

The textual evidence that supports the above claim is "Not only does it make financial sense to take the penny out of circulation, but it also makes environmental sense." [Para. 2]

Textual evidence is evidence related to a text which supports claims made in such a text.

Learn more about claims at:
brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1

6 0

2 years ago

An AC generator supplies an rms voltage of 120 V at 50.0 Hz. It is connected in series with a 0.650 H inductor, a 4.80 μF capaci

Serggg [28]

Answer:

Explanation:

f = 50.0 Hz, L = 0.650 H, π = 3.14

C = 4.80 μF, R = 301 Ω resistor. V = 120volts

XL = wL = 2πfL

= 2×3.14×50* 0.650

= 204.1 Ohm

Xc= 1/wC

Xc = 1/2πfC

Xc = 1/2×3.14×50×4.80μF

= 1/0.0015072

= 663.48Ohms

1. Total impedance, Z = sqrt (R^2 + (Xc-XL)^2)= √ 301^2+ (663.48Ohms - 204.1 Ohm)^2

√ 90601 + (459.38)^2

√ 90601+211029.98

√ 301630.9844

= 549.209

Z = 549.21Ohms

2. I=V/Z = 120/ 549.21Ohms =0.218Ampere

3. P=V×I = 120* 0.218 = 26.16Watt

Note that

I rms = Vrms/Xc

= 120/663.48Ohms

= 0.18086A

4. I(max) = I(rms) × √2

= 0.18086A × 1.4142

= 0.2557

= 0.256A

5. V=I(max) * XL

= 0.256A ×204.1

=52.2496

= 52.250volts

6. V=I(max) × Xc

= 0.256A × 663.48Ohms

= 169.85volts

7. Xc=XL

1/2πfC = 2πfL

1/2πfC = 2πf× 0.650

1/2×3.14×f×4.80μF = 2×3.14×f×0.650

1/6.28×f×4.8×10^-6 = 4.082f

1/0.000030144× f = 4.082×f

1 = 0.000030144×f×4.082×f

1 = 0.000123f^2

f^2 = 1/0.000123048

f^2 = 8126.922

f =√8126.922

f = 90.14 Hz

8 0

3 years ago

What are the benefits of using the engineering design process

Shalnov [3]

Answer:

Some of the benefits are tangible for they are visible in the design and production process, while the other benefits are intangible which may not be visible directly but result in improvement in the quality of product, better control over designing and production process, reduction of stress on the designers etc.

7 0

3 years ago

Scheduling can best be defined as the process used to determine:

shutvik [7]

Answer:

Overall project duration

Explanation:

Scheduling can best be defined as the process used to determine a overall project duration.

8 0

3 years ago

Three tool materials (high-speed steel, cemented carbide, and ceramic) are to be compared for the same turning operation on a ba

Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

Among all three tools, the ceramic tool is taking the least time for the production of a batch, however, machining from the HSS tool is taking the highest time.

Explanation:

The optimum cutting speed for the minimum cost

$V_{opt}= \frac{C}{\left[\left(T_c+\frac{C_e}{C_m}\right)\left(\frac{1}{n}-1\right)\right]^n}\;\cdots(i)$

Where,

C,n = Taylor equation parameters

$T_h$ =Tool changing time in minutes

$C_e$ =Cost per grinding per edge

$C_m$ = Machine and operator cost per minute

On comparing with the Taylor equation $VT^n=C$ ,

Tool life,

$T= \left[ \left(T_t+\frac{C_e}{C_m}\right)\left(\frac{1}{n}-1\right)\right]}\;\cdots(ii)$

Given that,

Cost of operator and machine time $=\$40/hr=\$0.667/min$

Batch setting time = 2 hr

Part handling time: $T_h=2.5$ min

Part diameter: $D=73 mm$ $=73\times 10^{-3} m$

Part length: $l=250 mm=250\times 10^{-3} m$

Feed: $f=0.30 mm/rev= 0.3\times 10^{-3} m/rev$

Depth of cut: $d=3.5 mm$

For the HSS tool:

Tool cost is $20 and it can be ground and reground 15 times and the grinding= $2/grind.

So, $C_e=$ $\$20/15+2=\$3.33/edge$

Tool changing time, $T_t=3$ min.

$C= 80 m/min$

$n=0.130$

(a) From equation (i), cutting speed for the minimum cost:

$V_{opt}= \frac {80}{\left[ \left(3+\frac{3.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.13}-1\right)\right]^{0.13}}$

$\Rightarrow 47.7$ m/min

(b) From equation (ii), the tool life,

$T=\left(3+\frac{3.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.13}-1\right)\right]}$

$\Rightarrow T=53.4$ min

(c) Cycle time: $T_c=T_h+T_m+\frac{T_t}{n_p}$

where,

$T_m=$ Machining time for one part

$n_p=$ Number of pieces cut in one tool life

$T_m= \frac{l}{fN}$ min, where $N=\frac{V_{opt}}{\pi D}$ is the rpm of the spindle.

$\Rightarrow T_m= \frac{\pi D l}{fV_{opt}}$

$\Rightarrow T_m=\frac{\pi \times 73 \times 250\times 10^{-6}}{0.3\times 10^{-3}\times 47.7}=4.01 min/pc$

So, the number of parts produced in one tool life

$n_p=\frac {T}{T_m}$

$\Rightarrow n_p=\frac {53.4}{4.01}=13.3$

Round it to the lower integer

$\Rightarrow n_p=13$

So, the cycle time

$T_c=2.5+4.01+\frac{3}{13}=6.74$ min/pc

(d) Cost per production unit:

$C_c= C_mT_c+\frac{C_e}{n_p}$

$\Rightarrow C_c=0.667\times6.74+\frac{3.33}{13}=\$4.75/pc$

(e) Total time to complete the batch= Sum of setup time and production time for one batch

$=2\times60+ {50\times 6.74}{50}=457 min=7.62 hr$ .

(f) The proportion of time spent actually cutting metal

$=\frac{50\times4.01}{457}=0.4387=43.87\%$

Now, for the cemented carbide tool:

Cost per edge,

$C_e=$ $\$8/6=\$1.33/edge$

Tool changing time, $T_t=1min$

$C= 650 m/min$

$n=0.30$

(a) Cutting speed for the minimum cost:

$V_{opt}= \frac {650}{\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.3}-1\right)\right]^{0.3}}=363m/min$ [from(i)]

(b) Tool life,

$T=\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.3}-1\right)\right]=7min$ [from(ii)]

(c) Cycle time:

$T_c=T_h+T_m+\frac{T_t}{n_p}$

$T_m= \frac{\pi D l}{fV_{opt}}$

$\Rightarrow T_m=\frac{\pi \times 73 \times 250\times 10^{-6}}{0.3\times 10^{-3}\times 363}=0.53min/pc$

$n_p=\frac {7}{0.53}=13.2$

$\Rightarrow n_p=13$ [ nearest lower integer]

So, the cycle time

$T_c=2.5+0.53+\frac{1}{13}=3.11 min/pc$

(d) Cost per production unit:

$C_c= C_mT_c+\frac{C_e}{n_p}$

$\Rightarrow C_c=0.667\times3.11+\frac{1.33}{13}=\$2.18/pc$

(e) Total time to complete the batch $=2\times60+ {50\times 3.11}{50}=275.5 min=4.59 hr$ .

(f) The proportion of time spent actually cutting metal

$=\frac{50\times0.53}{275.5}=0.0962=9.62\%$

Similarly, for the ceramic tool:

$C_e=$ $\$10/6=\$1.67/edge$

$T_t-1min$

$C= 3500 m/min$

$n=0.6$

(a) Cutting speed:

$V_{opt}= \frac {3500}{\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.67}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.6}-1\right)\right]^{0.6}}$

$\Rightarrow V_{opt}=2105 m/min$

(b) Tool life,

$T=\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.67}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.6}-1\right)\right]=2.33 min$

(c) Cycle time:

$T_c=T_h+T_m+\frac{T_t}{n_p}$

$\Rightarrow T_m=\frac{\pi \times 73 \times 250\times 10^{-6}}{0.3\times 10^{-3}\times 2105}=0.091 min/pc$

$n_p=\frac {2.33}{0.091}=25.6$

$\Rightarrow n_p=25 pc/tool\; life$

So,

$T_c=2.5+0.091+\frac{1}{25}=2.63 min/pc$

(d) Cost per production unit:

$C_c= C_mT_c+\frac{C_e}{n_p}$

$\Rightarrow C_c=0.667\times2.63+\frac{1.67}{25}=$1.82/pc$

(e) Total time to complete the batch

$=2\times60+ {50\times 2.63}=251.5 min=4.19 hr$ .

(f) The proportion of time spent actually cutting metal

$=\frac{50\times0.091}{251.5}=0.0181=1.81\%$

3 0

4 years ago