Answer: Not Enough Time
Often, the deadline date is decided before the project starts and is non-negotiable. This deadline results in a headlong rush to get started on the assumption, the sooner you begin coding, the sooner you'll finish.
A rush to start coding is almost always the wrong approach. It is important to spend the time to create a good design. Not having a good design leads to continuing changes throughout the development phase. When this happens, time and budget are consumed at a rapid rate.
Solution: Make time to create a good design. Don't be tempted to jump straight in and begin coding. Assign time to this task and the rest of the project will run much better. It will improve your reputation when you deliver something that fulfils the customers' expectations and works the first time correctly.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
Let A represent the first switch, B represent the second switch and C represent the bulb. Also, let 0 mean turned off and 1 mean turned on. Since when both switches are in the same position, the light is off. This can be represented by the following truth table:
A B C (output)
0 0 0
0 1 1
1 0 1
1 1 0
The logic circuit can be represented by:
C = A'B + AB'
The output (bulb) is on if the switches are at different positions; if the switches are at the same position, the output (bulb) is off. This is an XOR gate. The gate is represented in the diagram attached below.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
The "need" to build a roller coaster would not be considered an engineering design problem. This would be more of a management/accounting problem because they are the ones that analyze numbers and decide what the amusement park would need in order to maintain/increase profitability by attracting more customers. Therefore, if they "need" a new roller coaster to do so then it becomes their problem. For it to be an engineering design problem the statement should be "the need to design a roller coaster with certain specifics" or something along those lines.
