1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Valentin [98]
3 years ago
12

Which statement about chemical reaction rates is true?

Chemistry
2 answers:
Kruka [31]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

D)

Explanation:

The reactions can neither decrease or increase with few of it's molecules carrying up the test as explained by scientists.

aniked [119]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C

Explanation:

gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

gg

You might be interested in
How many
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

A. 1.50

Explanation:

9.01 x 1023 molecules* 1 mol/ 6.022×1023 molecules= 1.49618067087 moles

Rounded would be 1.50

5 0
2 years ago
How many atoms are in 45.22 moles of strontium​
AleksandrR [38]

Answer:

272.31× 10²³ atom of strontium

Explanation:

Given data:

Number of moles of strontium = 45.22 mol

Number of atoms = ?

Solution:

The given problem will solve by using Avogadro number.

It is the number of atoms , ions and molecules in one gram atom of element, one gram molecules of compound and one gram ions of a substance.  The number 6.022 × 10²³ is called Avogadro number.

1 mole = 6.022 × 10²³ atoms

45.22 mol × 6.022 × 10²³ atom / 1 mol

272.31× 10²³ atom

7 0
2 years ago
Which of the following elements is least likely to form a cation that will then form an ionic bond with an ion of a Group 7A ele
dexar [7]
F because it NEVER forms any cations in chemical reactions
8 0
3 years ago
Wht is the process of science cyclical and not a linear process??​
Dima020 [189]

Answer:The process of science is iterative.

Science circles back on itself so that useful ideas are built upon and used to learn even more about the natural world. This often means that successive investigations of a topic lead back to the same question, but at deeper and deeper levels. Let's begin with the basic question of how biological inheritance works. In the mid-1800s, Gregor Mendel showed that inheritance is particulate — that information is passed along in discrete packets that cannot be diluted. In the early 1900s, Walter Sutton and Theodor Boveri (among others) helped show that those particles of inheritance, today known as genes, were located on chromosomes. Experiments by Frederick Griffith, Oswald Avery, and many others soon elaborated on this understanding by showing that it was the DNA in chromosomes which carries genetic information. And then in 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick, again aided by the work of many others, provided an even more detailed understanding of inheritance by outlining the molecular structure of DNA. Still later in the 1960s, Marshall Nirenberg, Heinrich Matthaei, and others built upon this work to unravel the molecular code that allows DNA to encode proteins. And it doesn't stop there. Biologists have continued to deepen and extend our understanding of genes, how they are controlled, how patterns of control themselves are inherited, and how they produce the physical traits that pass from generation to generation. The process of science is not predetermined.

Any point in the process leads to many possible next steps, and where that next step leads could be a surprise. For example, instead of leading to a conclusion about tectonic movement, testing an idea about plate tectonics could lead to an observation of an unexpected rock layer. And that rock layer could trigger an interest in marine extinctions, which could spark a question about the dinosaur extinction — which might take the investigator off in an entirely new direction. At first this process might seem overwhelming. Even within the scope of a single investigation, science may involve many different people engaged in all sorts of different activities in different orders and at different points in time — it is simply much more dynamic, flexible, unpredictable, and rich than many textbooks represent it as. But don't panic! The scientific process may be complex, but the details are less important than the big picture …

4 0
3 years ago
What is the mass of 8.8 x 10^22 of magnesium
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Answer:

0.05

moles

Explanation:

In a mole of any substance, there exist

6.02⋅1023

units of that substance.

So here, we got:

3.01⋅1022Mg atoms⋅1mol6.02⋅1023M gatoms=0.05mol

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A student visits the beach during a very hot day. She steps on the sand and jumps because it is so hot. What type of heat transf
    10·2 answers
  • I’m which of the following kingdoms are prokaryotes found?i need help ASAP please help
    10·1 answer
  • Mendeleev’s table of elements was better accepted than those of other scientists at the time because _______________ . Moseley w
    15·2 answers
  • To receive traits from an ancestor _ _ _ _ _ _ _
    12·1 answer
  • Concept Review<br> 14.11. Can a reaction that is not reversible achieve chemical equilibrium?
    7·1 answer
  • 2. What happens to the heat in an exothermic reaction?
    8·1 answer
  • What is unique about the moons that orbit Jupiter? (select all that apply)
    11·2 answers
  • 1. What is an air mass? 2. What 2 factors characterize an air mass? 3. What determines the two characteristics of an air mass? 4
    5·2 answers
  • Which of these statements is correct?
    5·1 answer
  • What temperature creates hail
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!