Circumference C=2πr
<span>C=2π(1.5x10^8)=9.42x10^8 </span>
<span>In 365 Days there are 8760hr </span>
<span>V=distance/time </span>
<span>V=(9.42x10^8)/8760=107534.2km/hr </span>
Answer:B 20 newtons opposite to the direction of the applied force
Explanation:
Answer:
Spring's displacement, x = -0.04 meters.
Explanation:
Let the spring's displacement be x.
Given the following data;
Mass of each shrew, m = 2.0 g to kilograms = 2/1000 = 0.002 kg
Number of shrews, n = 49
Spring constant, k = 24 N/m
We know that acceleration due to gravity, g is equal to 9.8 m/s².
To find the spring's displacement;
At equilibrium position:
Fnet = Felastic + Fg = 0
But, Felastic = -kx
Total mass, Mt = nm
Fg = -Mt = -nmg
-kx -nmg = 0
Rearranging, we have;
kx = -nmg
Making x the subject of formula, we have;

Substituting into the formula, we have;


x = -0.04 m
Therefore, the spring's displacement is -0.04 meters.
Answer:
The ball would have landed 3.31m farther if the downward angle were 6.0° instead.
Explanation:
In order to solve this problem we must first start by doing a drawing that will represent the situation. (See picture attached).
We can see in the picture that the least the angle the farther the ball will go. So we need to find the A and B position to determine how farther the second shot would go. Let's start with point A.
So, first we need to determine the components of the velocity of the ball, like this:






we pick the positive one, so it takes 0.317s for the ball to hit on point A.
so now we can find the distance from the net to point A with this time. We can find it like this:



Once we found the distance between the net and point A, we can similarly find the distance between the net and point B:







t= -0.9159s or t=0.468s
we pick the positive one, so it takes 0.468s for the ball to hit on point B.
so now we can find the distance from the net to point B with this time. We can find it like this:



So once we got the two distances we can now find the difference between them:

so the ball would have landed 3.31m farther if the downward angle were 6.0° instead.