Answer:
1. Measure the temperature of the boxes and leave them unconnected.
2. Norton reduces his circuit down to a single resistance in parallel with a constant current source. A real-life Norton equivalent circuit would be continuously wasting power (as heat) as the current source dumps energy into the resistor, even when externally unconnected, while a Thevenin equivalent circuit would sit there doing nothing.
3. The Norton equivalent box would get warm and eventually run out of power. The Thevenin equivalent box would stay at ambient temperature.
National Council of Examiners for engineering and surveying a nonprofit organization
The lightning efficiency based on the scenario depicted will be C. 56 lumens/Watt, more efficient.
<h3>How to calculate the lightning efficiency</h3>
The efficiency of the incandescent bulb will be:
= 450/40 = 11.25 lumens per watt.
The efficiency of the LED bulb will be:
= 450/8 = 56 lumens per watt.
In this case, the LED bulb is more efficient than the incandescent bulb.
Therefore, the lighting efficiency will be 56 lumens/Watt, more efficient
Learn more lightning efficiency on:
brainly.com/question/25927632
The air flow necessary to remain at the lower explosive level is 4515. 04cfm
<h3>How to solve for the rate of air flow</h3>
First we have to find the rate of emission. This is solved as
2pints/1.5 x 1min
= 2/1.5x60
We have the following details
SG = 0.71
LEL = 1.9%
B = 10% = 0.1 a constant
The molecular weight is given as 74.12
Then we would have Q as
403*100*0.2222 / 74.12 * 0.71 * 0.1
= Q = 4515. 04
Hence we can conclude that the air flow necessary to remain at the lower explosive level is 4515. 04cfm
Read more on the rate of air flow on brainly.com/question/13289839
#SPJ1
