the answer is B because I jus did that
<h2>
Hello!</h2>
The answer is:
The empirical formula is the option B. 
<h2>
Why?</h2>
The empirical formula of a compound is the simplest formula that can be written. On the opposite, the molecular formula involves a variant of the same compound, but it can be also simplified to an empirical formula.

We are looking for a formula that cannot be simplified by dividing the number of molecules/atoms that conforms the compound.
Let's discard option by option in order to find which formula is an empirical formula (cannot be simplified)
A. 
It's not an empirical formula, it's a molecular formula since it can be obtained by multiplying the empirical formula of the same compound.

B. 
It's an empirical formula since it cannot be obtained by the multiplication of a whole number and the simplest formula. It's the simplest formula that we can find of the compound.
C. 
It's not an empirical formula, it's a molecular formula since it can be obtained by multiplying the empirical formula of the same compound.

D. 
It's not an empirical formula, it's a molecular formula since it can be obtained by multiplying the empirical formula of the same compound.

Hence, the empirical formula is the option B. 
Have a nice day!
How many protons does Thorium have? 90
How many neutrons does Thorium-234 have? 144
Calculate the mass defect for the isotope thorium-234 1.85864 amu
Explanation:
Let us assume that the value of
= 
Also at 1500 K,
= 

Relation between
and
is as follows.

Putting the given values into the above formula as follows.



Also, 
or, 
= 
= 
Thus, we can conclude that the value of
is
.