1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]
3 years ago
15

How do you think the body deals with consuming a lot more calories than are burnt?

Physics
2 answers:
Radda [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The body deals with consuming alot more calories than are burnt by gaining weight or holds it all up, while if you burn your calories, it'll lose weight :3

Explanation:

:3

natali 33 [55]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The body stores it as fat

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The nucleus of some isotopes will spontaneously undergo nuclear decay. These isotopes are said to be radioactive. What causes th
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]

Answer:

Here, he is able both to share his own suffering and—in a way that Mammy cannot—insist on his love for Laila. Babi's dream for leaving Afghanistan is, ironically, based in his love for the country—a love he thinks can be better kept alive by continuing to celebrate its culture and cuisine abroad.JThe nucleus of some isotopes will spontaneously undergo nuclear decay. These isotopes are said to be radioactive. What causes the nucleus of an isotope to be radioactive?

The electric force and nuclear forces are in opposition to each other

Nuclear forces disintegrate protons

There are too many electrons in its orbitals

The electric force causes electrons to be released

(please help i genuinely cant find out why)Babi had wanted Laila and Tariq to understand their country's living, breathing heritage—a heritage quite apart from the violence and turmoil of the national wars. The Buddhas, testimony to an ancient community of monks that lived in caves within the cliffs, symbolize the cultural richness of this national heritageAs an unstable atom tries to reach a stable form, energy and matter are released from the nucleus. This spontaneous change in the nucleus is called radioactive decay. When there is a change in the nucleus and one element changes into another, it is called transmutation.Carbon-14 is unstable and undergoes radioactive decay with a half-life of about 5,730 years (meaning that half of the material will be gone after 5,730 years). This decay means the amount of carbon-14 in an object serves as a clock, showing the object's age in a process called “carbon dating.”Nuclear decay occurs when the nucleus of an atom is unstable and spontaneously emits energy in the form of radiation. The result is that the nucleus changes into the nucleus of one or more other elements. These daughter nuclei have a lower mass and are more stable (lower in energy) than the parent nucleus.

7 0
2 years ago
BEST ANSWER GETS BRAINLIEST!
wel

Answer:

Distance = 16.9 m

Explanation:

We are given;

Power; P = 70 W

Intensity; I = 0.0195 W/m²

Now, for a spherical sound wave, the intensity in the radial direction is expressed as a function of distance r from the center of the sphere and is given by the expression;

I = Power/Unit area = P/(4πr²)

where;

P is the sound power

r is the distance.

Thus;

Making r the subject, we have;

r² = P/4πI

r = √(P/4πI)

r = √(70/(4π*0.0195))

r = √285.6627

r = 16.9 m

8 0
3 years ago
Regardless of the method used to generate electrical energy, the amount of energy provided by the
PSYCHO15rus [73]
Some of the energy is converted into heat. This is the main reason why electrical material gets hot when connected to a source. Therefore, your initial energy does not equal final energy. This does not violated energy conservation law because the energy is being converted so it is never lost. 
3 0
4 years ago
What is the shadow zone of an earth quake?
Nadusha1986 [10]

Answer:

It is the area on opposite side of the earth from an earthquake where no s waves are picked up by seismographs.

Explanation:

Shadow zone of an earthquake is one which is farthest from the epicenter. Hence it is not the area closest to earthquake.

In shadow zone only the S waves are stopped by whereas P waves through refracted, travel through and are measured in seismograph. Hence it is an area where there are few seismographs.

The zone is not constant and each epicenter has its own shadow zone. The shadow zone was caused by the inability of s waves to pass through the liquids. This proved the presence of liquid layer in earth's core. Hence the shadow zone is not the outer molten core of earth but the zone was caused by the molten core.

Hence the shadow zone of an earth quake  is the area on opposite side of the earth from an earthquake where no s waves are picked up by seismographs.

8 0
3 years ago
A small block of mass M = 0.10 kg is released from rest at point 1 at a height H = 1.8 m above the bottom of a track, as shown i
Ede4ka [16]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

A) is not correct, because the gravitation potential energy will depend on the height the block is located at. It will be calculated with the formula:

U=mgh.

If we take the ground as a zero height reference, then on point 2 the potential energy will be:

U_{2} = 0.10kg(9.81 m/s^{2})(0.6m)

U_{2}=0.59 J

While on point 3, the potential energy will be greater.

U_{3}=0.10kg(9.81 m/s^{2})(1.2m)

U_{3}=1.18 J

B) is not the right answer because the kinetic energy will vary with the height the block is located at in the fact that the energy is conserved (this is if we don't take friction into account or air resistance) so in this case:

U_{2}+K_{2}= U_{3}+K_{3}

We already know the potential energy at point 2. We can calculate the kinetic energy at point 3 like this:

K_{3} =\frac{1}{2}mv_{3}^{2}

K_{3} =\frac{1}{2}(0.10kg)(2.5 m/s)^{2}

K_{3} =0.31 J

So the kinetic energy at point 2 is given by the equation:

K_{2}  =U_{3}-U_{2}+K_{3}

so:

K_{2} = (1.18J)-(0.59J)+0.31J

K_{2} =0.9J

As you may see the kinetic energy at point 2 is greater than the kinetic energy at point 3.

C) Is not correct because according to the first law of thermodinamics, energy is not lost, only transformed. So, since we are not taking into account friction or any other kind of loss, then we can say that the amount of mechanical energy at point 1 is exactly the same as the mechanical energy at point 3.

D) Because of what we talked about on part C, this will be the true situation, because the mechanical energy of the block will be the same no matter theh point you measure it at.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • True or false. The super continent Pangea started to move 225 million years ago.
    11·2 answers
  • V is the velocity of a particle moving along the x axis as shown. If x = 2.0 m at
    10·1 answer
  • a bowling ball is rolling down the hall at a constant speed of 1.5 m/s. how far will the ball roll in 6.0 s.​
    6·1 answer
  • A television is tuned to a station broadcasting at a frequency of 2.04 * 108 Hz. For best reception, the rabbit-ear antenna used
    14·1 answer
  • You need to repair a broken fence in your yard. The hole in your fence is around 3 meters in length and for whatever reason, the
    10·1 answer
  • Sig figs are digits read directly from the measuring instruments plus one more digit which is By the observer
    11·1 answer
  • !!!URGENT!!! Worth 100 points!!
    7·2 answers
  • Calculate the value of 1 erg in si system​
    15·1 answer
  • True or false communication is important in healthy relationship​
    12·2 answers
  • Heidi (39 kg) is walking her tiny chihuahua, Chaxi (5.60 kg), on the sidewalk. To encourage Chaxi along, Heidi pulls forward wit
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!