Answer:
54 g is the theoretical yield
Explanation:
This is the reaction:
2H₂ + O₂ → 2H₂O
So 2 moles of hydrogen react with 1 mol of oxygen, to produce 2 mol of water.
If I have 3 moles of H₂ and 2 moles of O₂, the my limiting reactant is the hydrogen.
1 mol of O₂ react with 2 moles of H₂
S 2 mol of O₂ would react with 4 moles (I only have 3 moles)
Then, ratio is 2:2 the same as 1:1
As 2 mol of H₂ produce 2 moles of water, 3 moles of H₂ will produce 3 moles of H₂O.
This is the theoretical yield in moles. Let's convert them to mass (mol . molar mass)
3 mol . 18g/m = 54 g
Its tail helps it climb down the tall grasses and lets it swing from the grass like a monkey in a tree
Explanation:
Answer:
46.3g H2O
Explanation:
start by balancing it: CaC2(s) + 2H2O(g) -> Ca(OH)2(s) + C2H2(g)
then use factor label method to solve
82.4g CaC2 x (1 mol CaC2/64.10g CaC2) x (2 mol H2O/1 mol CaC2) x (18.016g H2O/1 mol H20) = 46.3g H2O
Answer is: key
design change for HFC-134a A/C systems versus CFC-12 A/C systems was quick
couple service fitting and that design reduce venting and mixing of
refrigerants during service.
<span>
Level of contamination is also reduced
and the emission of refrigerants and greenhouse gases (sulfur
dioxide, carbon dioxide) is also reduced.</span>
In terms of a deeper scientific reason, I am not sure, but the basic reason is quite simple. "Mud" tends to look like a mix between a solid, dirt, and a liquid, water or some other liquid. Since it is, in fact, a cross between a solid and a liquid, it has properties of both. It has certain physical and visual properties that only a solid would have, such as texture and opaqueness, but it also has physical properties of a liquid. Since it leans more towards the liquid side than the solid side, we say mud "flows" rather than saying that it "rolls" or "bounces".
