Answer:
One of the reasons why flashover fires are more prevalent today than it was in the past is that homes and furniture today are made from materials that are far more combustible than those of previous years.
Explanation:
A flashover fire is the rapid ignition and combustion of all flammable materials in an enclosed vicinity in a very short period of time.
Thirty years ago, the average escape time from a house that was on fire is about sixteen and fifty seconds...that would be approximately seventeen minutes. Presently that figure is down to four minutes.
One of the reasons identified is that the internal and external appurtenances especially furniture in use today are more combustible than those of previous years. That is, as they burn, they produce more heat and disintegrate faster.
The reason identified for this is, old houses were made of more natural materials such as real wood etc whilst the furniture and curtains in modern houses are mostly from synthetic materials.
Cheers
Answer and Explanation:
clear all; close all;
N=512;
t=(1:N)/N;
fs=1000;
f=(1:N)*fs/N;
x= sin(2*pi*200*t) + sin(2*pi*400*t);
y= sin(2*pi*200*t) + sin(2*pi*900*t);
for n = 1:20
a(n) = (2/N)*sum(x.*(cos(2*pi*n*t)))
b(n) = (2/N)*sum(x.*(sin(2*pi*n*t)))
c(n) = sqrt(a(n).^2+b(n).^2)
theta(n) =-(360/(2*pi))*atan(b(n)./a(n));
end
plot(f(1:20),c(1:20),'rd');
disp([a(1:4),b(1:4),c(1:4),theta(1:4)])
Given:
We have given two statements.
Statement 1: Proper footwear may include both leather and steel-toed shoes.
Statement 2: Leather-soled shoes provide slip resistance.
Find:
Which statement is true.
Solution:
A slip-resistant outsole is smoother and more slip-resistant than other outsole formulations when exposed to water and oil. A smoother outsole in rubber ensures a slip-resistant shoe can handle a slippery floor more effectively.
Slip resistant shoes have an interlocked tread pattern that does not close the water in, enabling the slip resistant sole to touch the floor to provide better slip resistance.
Leather-soled shoes don't provide slop resistance.
Therefore, both the Technicians are wrong.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
To know which is most or least cost-effective, it's not enough to look at only the per day rate, or only the time to complete. You have to multiply them to get the total cost of the project.
![\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}&Cost\ per\ day\ (\$)&Time\ to\ complete\ (days)&Total\ cost\ (\$)\\Zoe&500&8&4000\\Greg&650&10&6500\\Orion&400&12&4800\\Jin&700&5&3500\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccccc%7D%26Cost%5C%20per%5C%20day%5C%20%28%5C%24%29%26Time%5C%20to%5C%20complete%5C%20%28days%29%26Total%5C%20cost%5C%20%28%5C%24%29%5C%5CZoe%26500%268%264000%5C%5CGreg%26650%2610%266500%5C%5COrion%26400%2612%264800%5C%5CJin%26700%265%263500%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
As you can see, Greg is the least cost-effective because he charges the most for the project.
