Answer:
The dart with the small mass will travel the farthest distance.
Explanation:
Acceleration is proportional to force times mass, and inertia is proportional to mass. Inertia is the reluctance of a moving body to stop, and a stationary body to start moving (inertia increses with mass). Assuming they both have the same aerodynamic design, and that they are both launched with the same force applied for the same time duration, the dart with less small mass will accelerate faster than the big mass dart. From this we can see that the small dart will have covered a longer distance before the effect of the force stops, when compared to the more massive dart.
Answer:
ramp b requires less force than ramp a
Explanation:
Answer:
The portfolio should invest 48.94% in equity while 51.05% in the T-bills.
Explanation:
As the complete question is not given here ,the table of data is missing which is as attached herewith.
From the maximized equation of the utility function it is evident that

For the equity, here as
is percentage of the equity which is to be calculated
is the Risk premium whose value as seen from the attached data for the period 1926-2015 is 8.30%
is the risk aversion factor which is given as 4.
is the standard deviation of the portfolio which from the data for the period 1926-2015 is 20.59
By substituting values.

So the weight of equity is 48.94%.
Now the weight of T bills is given as

So the weight of T-bills is 51.05%.
The portfolio should invest 48.94% in equity while 51.05% in the T-bills.
Answer:
Yes, it is reasonable to neglect it.
Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, a single molecule of oxygen weights 32 g (diatomic oxygen) thus, the mass of kilograms is (consider Avogadro's number):

After that, we compute the potential energy 1.00 m above the reference point:

Then, we compute the average kinetic energy at the specified temperature:

Whereas
stands for the Avogadro's number for which we have:

In such a way, since the average kinetic energy energy is about 12000 times higher than the potential energy, it turns out reasonable to neglect the potential energy.
Regards.