<span>You have multiple confounding variables, you cannot accurately conclude the relationship between the manipulated and dependent variable because the other variables that are not controlled for could be the reason for seeing a certain change</span>
Answer:
A. Zero
Explanation:
Given data,
The charge of the test charge, q = 1 C
The distance the charge moved against the filed of intensity, x = 30 cm
= 0.3 m
The electric field intensity, E = 50 N/C
The energy stored in the charge at 0.3 m is given by the formula,
V = k q/r
Where,
= 9 x 10⁹ Nm²C⁻²
The charge is moved from the potential V₁ to V₂ at 30 cm
Substituting the given values in the above equation
V₁ = 9 x 10⁹ x 30 / 0.3
= 1.5 x 10¹² J
And,
V₂ = 1.5 x 10¹² J
The energy stored in it is,
W = V₂ - V₁
= 0
Hence, the energy stored in the charge is, W = 0
Answer:
A) F=-20.16×10⁹N
B) if the distance doubles, force is 4 times smaller.
Explanation:
q1=-28C
q2=5mC=0.005C
d=25cm=0.25m
Electrostatic force between charges: F=k×q1×q2/d², where k is a coefficient that has the value k=9 × 10⁹ N⋅m²⋅C^(-2) for air.
Thus:
F=9×10⁹×(-28)×0.005/0.25²
F=-20.16×10⁹N
The minus sign indicates attraction.
If distance doubles, d1=2×d, then we have 4d² at the denominator and the force is 4 times smaller.
Explanation:
ummm I believe it's frequency
They both provide a range of years of an object. I think. They’re just 2 different ways to tell the age of fossils or rocks