1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sashaice [31]
3 years ago
12

You throw a rock up into the air as hard as you can. It stays in the air a total of 6.0 s. What

Physics
1 answer:
vaieri [72.5K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

<h2>5.9 x 10</h2>

Explanation:

You might be interested in
c) If the ice block (no penguins) is pressed down even with the surface and then released, it will bounce up and down, until fri
eduard

Answer:

y = 20.99 V / A

there is no friction    y = 20.99 h

Explanation:

Let's solve this exercise in parts: first find the thrust on the block when it is submerged and then use the conservation of energy

when the block of ice is submerged it is subjected to two forces its weight  hydrostatic thrust

         

              F_net= ∑F = B-W

the expression stop pushing is

              B = ρ_water g V_ice

where rho_water is the density of pure water that we take as 1 10³ kg / m³ and V is the volume d of the submerged ice

We can write the weight of the body as a function of its density rho_hielo = 0.913 10³ kg / m³

             W = ρ-ice g V

              F_net = (ρ_water - ρ_ ice) g V

this is the net force directed upwards, we can find the potential energy with the expression

            F = -dU / dy

            ΔU = - ∫ F dy

            ΔU = - (ρ_water - ρ_ ice) g ∫ (A dy) dy

            ΔU = - (ρ_water - ρ_ ice) g A y² / 2

we evaluate between the limits y = 0,  U = 0, that is, the potential energy is zero at the surface

             U_ice = (ρ_water - ρ_ ice) g A y² / 2

now we can use the conservation of mechanical energy

starting point. Ice depth point

             Em₀ = U_ice = (ρ_water - ρ_ ice) g A y² / 2

final point. Highest point of the block

             Em_{f} = U = m g y

as there is no friction, energy is conserved

            Em₀ = Em_{f}

            (ρ_water - ρ_ ice) g A y² / 2 = mg y

let's write the weight of the block as a function of its density

            ρ_ice = m / V

            m = ρ_ice V

we substitute

             (ρ_water - ρ_ ice) g A y² / 2 = ρ_ice V g y

              y = ρ_ice / (ρ_water - ρ_ ice) 2 V / A

let's substitute the values

             y = 0.913 / (1 - 0.913) 2 V / A

             y = 20.99 V / A

This is the height that the lower part of the block rises in the air, we see that it depends on the relationship between volume and area, which gives great influence if there is friction, as in this case it is indicated that there is no friction

                V / A = h

where h is the height of the block

                 y = 20.99 h

7 0
4 years ago
Explain The Big Bang Theory in 100 Words​
mixer [17]

Answer:

The Big Bang Theory is the leading explanation about how the universe began. At its simplest, it says the universe as we know it started with a small singularity, then inflated over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we know today.

The Big Bang Theory is the leading explanation about how the universe began. At its simplest, it says the universe as we know it started with a small singularity, then inflated over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we know today.Because current instruments don't allow astronomers to peer back at the universe's birth, much of what we understand about the Big Bang Theory comes from mathematical formulas and models. Astronomers can, however, see the "echo" of the expansion through a phenomenon known as the cosmic microwave background.

The Big Bang Theory is the leading explanation about how the universe began. At its simplest, it says the universe as we know it started with a small singularity, then inflated over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we know today.Because current instruments don't allow astronomers to peer back at the universe's birth, much of what we understand about the Big Bang Theory comes from mathematical formulas and models. Astronomers can, however, see the "echo" of the expansion through a phenomenon known as the cosmic microwave background.While the majority of the astronomical community accepts the theory, there are some theorists who have alternative explanations besides the Big Bang - such as eternal inflation or an oscillating universe.

The Big Bang Theory is the leading explanation about how the universe began. At its simplest, it says the universe as we know it started with a small singularity, then inflated over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we know today.Because current instruments don't allow astronomers to peer back at the universe's birth, much of what we understand about the Big Bang Theory comes from mathematical formulas and models. Astronomers can, however, see the "echo" of the expansion through a phenomenon known as the cosmic microwave background.While the majority of the astronomical community accepts the theory, there are some theorists who have alternative explanations besides the Big Bang - such as eternal inflation or an oscillating universe.The phrase "Big Bang Theory" has been popular among astrophysicists for decades, but it hit the mainstream in 2007 when a comedy show with the same name premiered on CBS. The show follows the home and academic life of several researchers (including an astrophysicist).

The Big Bang Theory is the leading explanation about how the universe began. At its simplest, it says the universe as we know it started with a small singularity, then inflated over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we know today.Because current instruments don't allow astronomers to peer back at the universe's birth, much of what we understand about the Big Bang Theory comes from mathematical formulas and models. Astronomers can, however, see the "echo" of the expansion through a phenomenon known as the cosmic microwave background.While the majority of the astronomical community accepts the theory, there are some theorists who have alternative explanations besides the Big Bang - such as eternal inflation or an oscillating universe.The phrase "Big Bang Theory" has been popular among astrophysicists for decades, but it hit the mainstream in 2007 when a comedy show with the same name premiered on CBS. The show follows the home and academic life of several researchers (including an astrophysicist).Explanation:

HOPE IT HELP

7 0
3 years ago
In longitude waves, the medium moves parallel to the direction of energy transport
adelina 88 [10]
Yep that's correct
And transverse waves move perpendicular to the direction of energy transport
7 0
3 years ago
A 1750kg bumpercar moving at 1.50m/s to the right collides elastically with a 1450kg car going to the left at 1.10m/s. The 1750k
damaskus [11]
1984.08 kg that’s the answer
6 0
3 years ago
A 2.1 kg steel ball strikes a massive wall at 13.2 m/s at an angle of 64.8 ◦ with the perpendicular to the plane of the wall. It
solong [7]

Answer:

112 N

Explanation:

going through the question you would notice that some detail is missing, using search engines u was able to find a similar question on "https://socratic.org/questions/a-2-3-kg-steel-ball-strikes-a-wall-with-a-speed-of-8-5-m-s-at-an-angle-of-64-wit"

and here is the question i found

"A 2.3 kg steel ball strikes a wall with a speed of 8.5 m/s at an angle of 64⁰ with the surface. It bounces off with the same speed and angle. If the ball is in contact with the wall for 0.448 s. What is the average force exerted by the ball?"

you would notice that there is a change in the values from the question posted, hence we would only take the following part to complete our question, " If the ball is in contact with the wall for 0.448 s what is the average force exerted by the ball?" while retaining all original detail.

solution

mass of ball (m) = 2.1 kg

speed of ball (v) = 13.2 m/s

angle of contact (p) = 64.8°

time of contact (t) = 0.448 s

What is the average force exerted by the ball?

The average force exerted by the ball = \frac{change in momentum}{change in time}

where

  • The momentum changes only the direction perpendicular to the wall, hence the component of momentum perpendicular to the wall = m x v x sin (p) = 2.1 x 13.2 x sin 64.8 = 25.1 kg.m/s

       since the ball strikes the wall and bounces off it with the same speed            

       and at the same angle, the component of momentum acting  

       perpendicular to the wall remains the same while hitting and leaving

       the wall but in opposite directions.

Hence the component of momentum acting perpendicular to the wall while hitting and leaving the wall will be 25.1 kg.m/s and -25.1 kg.m/s respectively.

change in momentum = 25.1 - (-25.1) = 25.1 + 25.1 = 50.2 kg.m/s

  • change in time = 0.448 s
  • now substituting the above into the equation we have

The average force exerted by the ball = \frac{50.2}{0.448} = 112 N

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Your physical education teacher has set up a modified shuttle run event for a class competition. From the starting position, you
    13·1 answer
  • The production of an electric current by a changing magnetic field is known as
    7·2 answers
  • Give an example of something that is cyclic and non - cyclic
    6·1 answer
  • Which formula can be used to find the magnitude of the resultant vector? R2 = Rx2 + Ry2 R = Rx + Ry R = Rx(cosθ) R = Rx(sinθ)
    14·2 answers
  • In addition to National Electrical Code requirements, some areas have ___ requirements for energy conservation that also affect
    8·1 answer
  • What percentage of energy consumed in the united states is nonrenewable??
    15·1 answer
  • Pat Kinch used a racing cycle to travel 75.57 km/h. Suppose Kinch moved at this speed around a circular track. If the combined m
    14·1 answer
  • Assuming Faraday constant to be 96500c/mol and relative atomic mass of copper 63,calculate the mass of copper liberated by 2A cu
    14·1 answer
  • The force required to change an object's motion depends on the object's mass. True or False ​
    12·1 answer
  • Using the criteria you described in your previous answer, how would you compare solar power to fossil fuel power?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!