1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MissTica
2 years ago
8

Which statement explains whether or not a person should use an experiment of a ball rolling down a hill as evidence that the for

ce of gravity pulls objects straight down?(1 point) They should use it. Any experiment on Earth involving natural motion will provide direct evidence that gravity pulls objects straight down. They should use it. Any experiment on Earth involving natural motion will provide direct evidence that gravity pulls objects straight down. They should not use it. The experiment has several dimensions of motion, including one parallel to the ground, so the motion of the ball does not directly test the force of gravity. They should not use it. The experiment has several dimensions of motion, including one parallel to the ground, so the motion of the ball does not directly test the force of gravity. They should use it. The experiment shows the ball falls toward the bottom of the hill, so it provides direct evidence that gravity pulls an object downward. They should use it. The experiment shows the ball falls toward the bottom of the hill, so it provides direct evidence that gravity pulls an object downward. They should not use it. Gravity should be tested in space, and this experiment could only be tested on Earth.
Physics
1 answer:
Ksenya-84 [330]2 years ago
8 0

The ball raised up the hill is given gravitational potential energy, which

causes it to roll spontaneously down the hill.

The statement that explains whether the ball rolling down the hill

experiment should be used is; <u>The experiment shows the ball falls toward </u>

<u>the bottom of the hill, so it provides direct evidence that gravity pulls an </u>

<u>object downward. They should use it.</u>

Reason:

The equation for the velocity of a ball falling down a hill is v = \sqrt{\dfrac{10}{7} \cdot g \cdot h}

Therefore, by increasing the height from which the ball rolls down the hill,

the velocity of the ball increases, which indicates that the ball is

accelerating, and therefore, being acted on by a force, the force of gravity.

Therefore;

Given that the ball falls or moves with increasing speed towards

the bottom of the hill, which shows that the motion is due to Earth's pull

known as the gravitational force, the experiment should be used.

Learn more here:

brainly.com/question/3175380

You might be interested in
Based on the most widely accepted scientific explanation, elements began to form shortly after the big bang. Which of the follow
worty [1.4K]
Big Bang is a theory that, as stated above, has grown to become widely acceptable scientific explanation of the origin of things. Research would say that according to this theory, the Earth originated billion years ago through an explosive of a highly energized point.

Through this explosion, the elements were formed. However, only the lightest of the elements including hydrogen and helium, with traces of lithium and beryllium. From the choices, the answer would have to be the second choice, helium.

Answer: B. helium
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What should be angle between force and displacement to get the maximum work​
aleksandrvk [35]

Answer: The angle between force and displacement should be θ = 90° for minimum work. The angle between force and displacement should be θ = 0° for maximum work.

7 0
2 years ago
The left side of the lever was forced down 10 inches in order to raise the rock 7 inches. The ideal mechanical advantage is
Yanka [14]

Answer:

1.42

Explanation:

<em> got it right on my homework </em>

6 0
2 years ago
Which is a device that stores electric charge by separating positive and negative charges?
juin [17]
A camera flash or lighting bolt because stored separated positive and negative charges --> caused them to do work by briefly lighting a bulb as the separated charges moved back together
3 0
3 years ago
Why do plants not need digistive system
WINSTONCH [101]
Humans need a digestive system to do cellular respiration, which produces energy used for growth and movement.

Plants do not need one as they make their own energy through photosynthesis. The process produces glucose, which is a form of energy for the plants.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In order to be considered work, the components that must be present are?..
    11·2 answers
  • A net force of 16 N causes a mass to accelerate at a rate of 5 m/s^2. Determine the mass.
    15·1 answer
  • A 7-n vector at an angle of 45° to the horizontal has a vertical component that is about _______.
    6·1 answer
  • Study the table, which shows the length of a pendulum and the corresponding time period it takes to make a complete swing back a
    6·2 answers
  • A scientist observed the formation of hundreds of maggots and many flies on a rotting meat slice exposed to the environment. Wha
    12·1 answer
  • If the distance between two charged particles is doubled, the force between them changes by a factor of ___. (1 point)
    14·1 answer
  • According to modern atomic theory, it is nearly impossible to determine an electron’s exact
    6·1 answer
  • A 45.0 g hard-boiled egg moves on the end of a spring with force constant 25.0 N/m. Its initial displacement 0.500 m. A damping
    14·1 answer
  • The Thomson model of a hydrogen atom is a sphere of positive charge with an electron (a point charge) at its center. The total p
    9·1 answer
  • Se tienen 500g de alcohol etílico a una temperatura de -40 °C ¿Cuánto calor se necesita para transformarlo a vapor a una tempera
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!