All categories

3 years ago

Where’s the silicone rubber are made ? In a machine, vulcanization… explain please !!!!! I need help

1 answer:

4 0

Answer: This is done by heating a large volume of quartz sand to temperatures as high as 1800˚C. The result is pure, isolated silicon, which is allowed to cool and then ground into a fine powder. To make silicone, this fine silicon powder is combined with methyl chloride and heated once again.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Write a function named "total_population" that takes a string then a list as parameters where the string represents the name of

adelina 88 [10]

Answer:

Return the total population of all cities in the list.

Explanation:

It is for every element in cityinfo. It works not only for one array but multiple.

I attached the document with the code or function with the name import cvs becuase when I wrote it down and it sent a message written on red about inappropriate words.

Download docx

5 0

4 years ago

Do heavier cars really use more gasoline? Suppose a car is chosen at random. Let x be the weight of the car (in hundreds of poun

Alex17521 [72]

Answer:

Answer is explained in the explanation section below.

Explanation:

Solution:

Note: This question is incomplete and lacks necessary data to solve. But I have found the similar question on the internet. So, I will be using the data from that question to solve this question for the sack of concept and understanding.

Data Given:

x = 27 , 44 , 32 , 47, 23 , 40, 34, 52

y = 30, 19, 24, 13 , 29, 19, 21, 14

It is given that,

∑x = 299

∑y = 167

∑ $x^{2}$ = 11887

∑ $y^{2}$ = 3773

We are asked to verify the above values manually in this question.

So,

1. ∑x = 299

Let's verify it:

∑x = 27 + 44 + 32 + 47 + 23 + 40 + 34 + 52

∑x = 299

Yes, it is equal to the given value. Hence, verified.

2. ∑y = 167

Let's verify it:

∑y = 30 + 19 + 24 + 13 + 29 + 19 + 21 + 14

∑y = 169

No, it is not equal to the given value.

3. ∑ $x^{2}$ = 11887

Let's verify it:

For this to find, first we need to square all the value of x individually and then add them together to verify.

∑ $x^{2}$ = $27^{2}$ + $44^{2}$ + $32^{2}$ + $47^{2}$ + $23^{2}$ + $40^{2}$ + $34^{2}$ + $52^{2}$

∑ $x^{2}$ = 11,887

Yes, it is equal to the given value. Hence, verified.

4. ∑ $y^{2}$ = 3773

Let's verify it:

Again, for this we need to find the squares of all the y values and then add them together to verify it.

∑ $y^{2}$ = $30^{2}$ + $19^{2}$ + $24^{2}$ + $13^{2}$ + $29^{2}$ + $19^{2}$ + $21^{2}$ + $14^{2}$

∑ $y^{2}$ = 3,845

No, it is not equal to the given value.

4 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HURRY!!!

Naily [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

He should get a job in engineering to see what it's like to work in the field.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A plane wall of thickness 0.1 m and thermal conductivity 25 W/m·K having uniform volumetric heat generation of 0.3 MW/m3 is insu

Contact [7]

Answer:

T = 167 ° C

Explanation:

To solve the question we have the following known variables

Type of surface = plane wall ,

Thermal conductivity k = 25.0 W/m·K,

Thickness L = 0.1 m,

Heat generation rate q' = 0.300 MW/m³,

Heat transfer coefficient hc = 400 W/m² ·K,

Ambient temperature T∞ = 32.0 °C

We are to determine the maximum temperature in the wall

Assumptions for the calculation are as follows

Negligible heat loss through the insulation
Steady state system
One dimensional conduction across the wall

Therefore by the one dimensional conduction equation we have

$k\frac{d^{2}T }{dx^{2} } +q'_{G} = \rho c\frac{dT}{dt}$

During steady state

$\frac{dT}{dt}$ = 0 which gives $k\frac{d^{2}T }{dx^{2} } +q'_{G} = 0$

From which we have $\frac{d^{2}T }{dx^{2} } = -\frac{q'_{G}}{k}$

Considering the boundary condition at x =0 where there is no heat loss

$\frac{dT}{dt}$ = 0 also at the other end of the plane wall we have

$-k\frac{dT }{dx } =$ hc (T - T∞) at point x = L

Integrating the equation we have

$\frac{dT }{dx } = \frac{q'_{G}}{k} x+ C_{1}$ from which C₁ is evaluated from the first boundary condition thus

0 = $\frac{q'_{G}}{k} (0)+ C_{1}$ from which C₁ = 0

From the second integration we have

$T = -\frac{q'_{G}}{2k} x^{2} + C_{2}$

From which we can solve for C₂ by substituting the T and the first derivative into the second boundary condition s follows

$-k\frac{q'_{G}L}{k} = h_{c}( -\frac{q'_{G}L^{2} }{k} + C_{2}-T∞)$ → C₂ = $q'_{G}L(\frac{1}{h_{c} }+ \frac{L}{2k} } )+T∞$

T(x) = $\frac{q'_{G}}{2k} x^{2} + q'_{G}L(\frac{1}{h_{c} }+ \frac{L}{2k} } )+T∞$ and T(x) = T∞ + $\frac{q'_{G}}{2k} (L^{2}+(\frac{2kL}{h_{c} }} )-x^{2} )$