Explanation:
V=u+at
where,
v=final speed
u=initial speed,(starting speed)
a=acceleration
t=time
- v=u+at = 6=2+a*2
6=2+2a
2a=6-2
2a=4
a=4/2 = 2
a =2
2. to find time taken
v=u+at
25=5*2t
2t=25-5
2t=20
t=20/2
t=10sec
3. finding final speed
v=u+at
v=4+10*2
=4+20
v=24m/sec
5.v=u+at
=5+8*10
=5+80
V=85m/sev
6. v=u+at
8=u+4*2
8=u+8
U=8/8
u=1
these are your missing values
By combining blue with yellow light is like combining blue light with red and green light. The result of combining these three primary colors of light is to produce white light.
<h3>What is laundry bluing ?</h3>
Laundry bluing is a product adds a trace amount of blue dye to white fabric during laundering to improve its appearance.
Bluing products in higher concentrations can darken jeans and other blue cloth.
The blue overpowered the yellow to reflect white (at least the appearance of white to the human eye).
Blue and yellow are complementary colors that combine to reflect white, Fabrics.
Here,
Yellow light is a combination of red and green light. So combining blue with yellow light is like combining blue light with red and green light. The result of combining these three primary colors of light is to produce white light.
Learn more about White light here:brainly.com/question/16317768
#SPJ1
Answer: hope it helps you...❤❤❤❤
Explanation: If your values have dimensions like time, length, temperature, etc, then if the dimensions are not the same then the values are not the same. So a “dimensionally wrong equation” is always false and cannot represent a correct physical relation.
No, not necessarily.
For instance, Newton’s 2nd law is F=p˙ , or the sum of the applied forces on a body is equal to its time rate of change of its momentum. This is dimensionally correct, and a correct physical relation. It’s fine.
But take a look at this (incorrect) equation for the force of gravity:
F=−G(m+M)Mm√|r|3r
It has all the nice properties you’d expect: It’s dimensionally correct (assuming the standard traditional value for G ), it’s attractive, it’s symmetric in the masses, it’s inverse-square, etc. But it doesn’t correspond to a real, physical force.
It’s a counter-example to the claim that a dimensionally correct equation is necessarily a correct physical relation.
A simpler counter example is 1=2 . It is stating the equality of two dimensionless numbers. It is trivially dimensionally correct. But it is false.
